Search for: "Baxter, Appeal of"
Results 181 - 200
of 501
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2010, 3:54 pm
The trial court agreed and the Johnsons appealed. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
White ("White"), an African-American, appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant, Baxter Healthcare Corporation ("Baxter"), on White's employment discrimination claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
White ("White"), an African-American, appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant, Baxter Healthcare Corporation ("Baxter"), on White's employment discrimination claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:00 am
Justices Baxter and Corrigan were both recused. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 8:40 pm
Horizon West, S203130—Review Denied [Baxter, J., voting for review]—July 18, 2012. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 5:02 pm
Justices Baxter, Chin and Corrigan dissented from the majority’s interpretation, believing that the plain language of the statute was dispositive and therefore looking at the legislative history was not necessary. [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:27 am
Claim 1, reproduced below, is representative of the subject matter on appeal.1. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:26 pm
Baxter, Placing The Burger Court in Historical Perspective, 47 ANTITRUST L.J. 803, 816 (1978); Robert H. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 9:31 am
Baxter Int’l, Inc., 721 F.3d 1330, 1340(Fed. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:59 am
The trial court denied the employers’ petition to compel arbitration and they appealed. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:45 pm
To reach a decision in this case, the Supreme Court would have needed to appoint four temporary justices: one to replace Justice Moreno, two to replace Justices Chin and Baxter who recused themselves from participation in this case when review was granted, and one to replace Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye, who is disqualified from participation in this case because she wrote the Court of Appeal’s opinion when she was still a member of that court. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
The California Supreme Court declined to take up this case in July 2014, over the dissent of Justice Baxter, who voted to grant review. [read post]
15 May 2014, 1:01 pm
Baxter Int’l, Inc., 721 F.3d 1330, 1334 (Fed. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:04 am
Justice Baxter's opinion is a concurrence, but it represents the view of a solid majority of the court. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:16 am
Baxter, 34 Kan. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 9:33 pm
See In re Baxter Int'l, Inc., 698 F.3d 1349, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 8:28 am
The Court of Appeals observed that to prevail on his petition, Iain was required to show that Australia was the children's habitual residence at the time of their retention in the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 6:06 am
This appeal ensued.Smith v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 8:09 am
Scarborough was appointed to represent six of the defendants on appeal, beginning with their motions for a new trial before trial judge Jerry Baxter. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:14 am
Magistrate Judge Andrew Baxter (N.D.N.Y.) didn't release a written opinion, but stated that the motion was denied "for the reasons stated on the record during the stenographically-recorded telephone conference on 5/24/2023"; I expect no transcript has yet been prepared, but if the plaintiff appeals to the District Judge, the transcript will likely be filed at that point. [read post]
