Search for: "Board of Review v. Second Judicial District Court" Results 181 - 200 of 863
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2023, 12:30 pm by Ronald Mann
” CPI looks to the second situation, contending that the court should find abrogation in PROMESA’s provisions for judicial review, which plainly subject the board to jurisdiction in the U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The rates of these licenses are determined by the Copyright Royalty board, an agency in the Library of Congress comprised of three full-time Copyright Royalty Judges who set rates through quasi-judicial proceedings. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:07 am
Marquesa at Monarch Beach Homeowners Association (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 1111, the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, emphasized that boards of directors of homeowners associations do not have the discretion to ignore the express requirements of the conditions, covenants and restrictions (“CC&Rs”) for the development, despite the “judicial deference rule” adopted by the California Supreme Court in… [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am by Bernard Bell
This is the second in a series of three posts discussing Campaign Legal Center. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 3:15 pm
The Court finds that the matter should be remanded to the Parole Board for a de novo parole interview. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:34 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on June 8, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department BETSY BARROS, J.P. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:34 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on June 8, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department BETSY BARROS, J.P. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 9:58 am by Eugene Volokh
  From a Copyright Review Board decision (Re: Second Request for Reconsideration for Refusal to Register A Recent Entrance to Paradise) last week: On November 3, 2018, Thaler filed an application to register a copyright claim in the Work. [read post]
Eighteen states, while arguing that the district courts had jurisdiction to hear their claims, filed protective petitions for review in their respective circuit courts. [read post]