Search for: "C Frank" Results 181 - 200 of 3,588
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2012, 10:03 am
He is, therefore, not entitled to a Franks hearing, and the court must deny the Motion for a Franks Hearing (ECF No. 57). [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 4:00 am
The CI was not sufficiently involved with law enforcement activities to be a government agent for Franks purposes. [read post]
22 May 2012, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act and related regulation will likely have a significant impact on both financial and nonfinancial end-users. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 10:36 am
It was not a Franks violation to fail to include that the informant was defendant's former girlfriend with a motive to do him in. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:22 pm
The trial court found a Franks violation and purged the information from the affidavit. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:37 am
November 5, 2010) (unpublished).* [My view is: if in doubt, give the defendant a Franks hearing. [read post]
3 Sep 2006, 10:01 am
The Seventh Circuit held that it follows the First Circuit and adopts the "clearly erroneous" standard of review for alleged Franks violations and not de novo review under Ornelas. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
For a more detailed discussion on this issue and Section 953(b), see Dodd-Frank, Compensation Ratios, and the Expanding Role of Shareholders in the Governance Process. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
For a more detailed discussion on this issue and Section 953(b), see Dodd-Frank, Compensation Ratios, and the Expanding Role of Shareholders in the Governance Process. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 11:38 am
Officers did not violate Franks where they did not know of the CI's firearms arrest until after the search warrant was applied for. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 4:45 pm by James Hamilton
According to the IRS, the parallel language suggests that Congress was attempting to harmonize the category of swaps excluded under Section 1601 with swaps that qualify as notional principal contracts under § 1.446-3(c), rather than with the contracts defined as swaps under Section 721 of Dodd-Frank. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:29 am
In a Franks challenge, the court should not look beyond the affidavit and what it shows. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 11:26 am by Steven Berk
In Wednesday’s Wall Street Journal, Scott Patterson and Jenny Strasburg break news that the SEC accidentally revealed Peter C. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:13 am
Defendant challenged the PC for the SW because of an alleged Franks violation because the officer omitted from the affidavit for the search warrant that defendant was towing a lawnmower behind his bicycle when he got to the place of the search. [read post]