Search for: "California v. Lord" Results 181 - 200 of 304
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
: Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PatLit) Is it safe? [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am by INFORRM
The National Security Bill was read for the first time in the House of Lords. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 5:31 am
– Public reveal and protecting IP rights (Patent Arcade) (IPblog)   US Patents – Decisions District Court E D Texas: Marshall jury finds for defendant Google - no infringement and patents invalid: Function Media v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm by Eugene Volokh
Janis Joplin sang, “Lord, won’t you buy me a Mercedes Benz”; the law rightly did not require her to sing, “Lord, won’t you buy me a generic expensive car” instead. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Northern Ireland The Belfast News Letter had a piece by Lord Lexden, “Stormont has not explained why it refuses to reform libel law to protect free speech and journalism” and another by Kate Hoey. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 6:11 am by Susan Brenner
In Omychund v Barker (1745) 1 Atk, 21, 49; 26 ER 15, 33, Lord Harwicke stated that no evidence was admissible unless it was `the best that the nature of the case will allow’. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 7:01 am by Florian Mueller
At the end of my post on Apple's Black Friday motion to bring infringement claims against six more Samsung products in California I promised that I would report on the two Samsung v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Rev __ (2018 Forthcoming), Eumi Lee, University of California Hastings College of the Law. [read post]
13 May 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The issue is now to be dealt with by the Parliamentary process known as “ping pong” – with the House of Lords deciding on Monday whether to reinstate the Leveson 2 amendment and send it back to the House of Commons for reconsideration by MPs. [read post]