Search for: "Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Duree" Results 181 - 200 of 305
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2014, 6:33 am by Robert Kreisman
Related blog posts: llinois Jury Finds for Doctor in Newborn Brain Injury Case; Eckstein v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
During that era, professors might have thought that a student who thought that homosexuality is normal showed a lack of good medical judgment, and might well counsel and treat patients in irresponsible ways (by the standards of the profession of the time). [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 9:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Related blog posts: $1.5 Million Jury Verdict for Postop Nerve Damage in Vaginal Prolapse Reconstruction Surgery DePuy Metal-On-Metal Hip Replacement Products Will No Longer Be Produced by Johnson & Johnson Jury Verdict for Doctor for Screw Allegedly Misplaced During Lumbar Fusion – Nyquist v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
Pfizer, Inc., 712 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2013), Aetna, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am by Mark Zamora
Conway Express, Inc., 261 Ga. 41 (1991); Georgia Power Co. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 10:36 am
Sisson and her husband sued the product manufacturer, CR Bard, Inc., claiming that Bard knew about the problems associated with these mesh products but failed to warn doctors and consumers. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 3:22 pm by Richard Montes
University OB-GYN Associates, Inc., the plaintiffs commenced a medical malpractice action for injuries to their infant during delivery, but did not correctly name the doctor that delivered their infant. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 1:43 pm by Bexis
QHG of Springdale, Inc., 2012 Ark. 55, ___ S.W.3d ___, 2012 WL 401512 (Feb. 9, 2012). [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am by James F. Aspell
It is in the best interest of the employer to keep close contact with the injured employee during their recovery phase. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 8:10 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
  That is the question that was raised in the recent case of Parmalat Canada Inc. v. [read post]