Search for: "Doctor v. Employment Division"
Results 181 - 200
of 359
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2015, 6:30 am
The Supreme Court just decided a case called Young v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 am
Borne v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:19 pm
Despite the Husband's lamentations of inability to obtain employment, this Court is not satisfied that he has done everything possible to secure employment. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 10:00 pm
On appeal the Appellate Division reversed, stating that all the areas of the body which hurt petitioner while working in these subsequent employments were the same areas he originally injured in 1982. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 10:27 am
Kadlec Medical Center, Division III of the Washington State Court of Appeals, overturned the dismissal of a doctor’s racial discrimination and retaliation claims. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 7:21 am
However, these statements were not direct evidence of discrimination (EEOC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:49 am
Few people win under the statute, but this guy did.The case is Blashka v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 7:31 am
Pacific Coast Elevators , March 10, 2015, California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division One More Blog Entries: Sutherland v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
1930 Amendment to Permit Employer to Change Treating Doctor What other principles have been forgotten which might be of use to employers? [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
Officers & Police Benevolent Assn., Inc. v New York State Dept. of Corr. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:25 am
Regents of UC, Feb. 20, 2015, California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division One More Blog Entries: Halvorson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 11:18 am
(See Prewitt v Walgreens Order). [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 4:25 am
He escaped before the truck exploded and sustained some injuries, albeit minor.IMSS paid Valenzuela for his lost daily wages and covered the cost of his medical care from doctors within its network of providers.But, in September 2010, Valenzuela filed an injury report with the Arizona Industrial Commission naming Porteadores as his employer. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am
In Greater Glasgow Health Board v Doogan & Anor [2014] UKSC 68, the Supreme Court considered the ambit of the right under s 4. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 11:25 am
So if you go to the doctor and the doctor tells you to go home and rest then you are out of luck. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:24 am
So if a doctor said it was necessary then it was...Now, the First District Court of Appeals for California has agreed to hear a constitutional challenge to the IMR process.A date and time for the oral argument in Stevens v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 3:30 am
The court also cited Abbamount v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:26 am
The Supreme Court today hears oral argument in Young v. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 3:53 am
On 22 July 2012, in accordance with the Service Agreement, the fifth pursuer gave the defender twelve months notice of the termination of his employment. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 2:48 am
” Beese v. [read post]
