Search for: "Dow v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 1,045
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2019, 4:27 am
This was summarised by HHJ Hacon as a "basic principle of patent law in the United Kingdom" and cited Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical Inc v H. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:30 am by Tinker Ready
Judge Jed Rakoff of the United States District Court in Manhattan, a former member of the National Commission on Forensic Science, said the weakest pattern analysis fields rely more on examiner intuition than science. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 4:53 am by Florian Mueller
Qualcomm antitrust trial will begin in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 874 F.2d 307, 311-12 (5th Cir. 1989) (“Fortunately, we do not have to resolve any of the above questions [as to bias and confounding], since the studies presented to us incorporate the possibility of these factors by the use of a confidence interval. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am by Schachtman
”13 Mandatory Not Precatory The better reasoned cases decided under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, and state-court analogues, follow the Reference Manual in making clear that confounding factors must be carefully addressed and eliminated. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 6:50 am by Shana Tabak
Lee, General Counsel, Export-Import Bank of the United States Elizabeth R. [read post]