Search for: "First Specialty Insurance Corporation" Results 181 - 200 of 335
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2014, 6:59 am by Rich McHugh
For the first time, the Court has ruled that the RFRA covers corporations–or at least certain corporations. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:04 am by Rich McHugh
For the first time, the Court has ruled that the RFRA covers corporations–or at least certain corporations. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:17 pm by Amy Howe
  First, RFRA was intended to apply very broadly, and the purpose of protecting corporations is to protect the rights of the people associated with the corporation. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:26 am by Jason Shinn
   The post Corporations can Hold Religious Objections in order to Opt Out of covering Contraceptives for Women. appeared first on Michigan Employment Law Advisor. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:14 am by David Kemp
The Court noted that its decision concerns only the contraceptive mandate, not all insurance-coverage mandates, e.g., for vaccinations or blood transfusions.The post Justia Resources and Commentary on the Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby Decision appeared first on Justia Law, Technology & Legal Marketing Blog. [read post]
21 May 2014, 8:32 pm by J. Ric Gass
Multiple medical specialty areas were represented in the experts on both sides. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 3:34 am by Kevin LaCroix
As proof of this point, I am happy to publish this picture of the Moscow skyline, sent in to us by Alma Malysheva, the head of the Corporate Clients Liability division for Rosgosstrakh, which Alma reports is one of the three largest insurers in Russia. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:17 am by Joy Waltemath
In the second case, secular, for-profit corporation Conestoga Wood Specialties was previously denied an injunction preventing enforcement of the contraceptive mandate. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:37 am by Amy Howe
Hobby Lobby Stores and Conestoga Wood Specialties v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:32 pm by Mark Walsh
Hobby Lobby Stores and Conestega Wood Specialties v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 2:29 pm by Amy Howe
Several Justices also expressed doubt about whether, even if a corporation can exercise religion for purposes of RFRA, the government has a compelling interest in requiring corporations like Hobby Lobby to provide insurance that includes access to free birth control or the mandate is the narrowest possible way to do so. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:30 pm by Lyle Denniston
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decided that neither the company, Conestoga Wood Specialties, nor its owners could claim First Amendment religious rights — because, it found, the corporation is incapable of doing so, and because the owners had chosen the corporate form for their business and it stands apart from their personal interests. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:31 pm by Gene Killian
The CGL policy, which Joule purchased from Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation,  contained an “employer’s liability exclusion. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:20 pm by Marty Lederman
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. [read post]