Search for: "Fletcher v. District Court" Results 181 - 200 of 459
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2014, 7:16 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
General panels topics included Litigation and Legislative Updates; Tribal v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 11:03 am
 The district court denies the petition, and back in 2011, a three-judge panel affirms. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Fifth Avenue Chrysler Center, Inc,, 454 P.2d 244, 247 (Alaska 1969).ArizonaNo Arizona court has directly passed on innovator liability, but the federal district court in the Darvocetlitigation twice held that the theory was incompatible with Arizona law. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:07 am by James Kachmar
This column addressed the Ninth Circuit’s decision in the case Petrella v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
Nugent, in which the Court GVR'd to the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of last week's per curiam reversal without full briefing (also of the Fifth Circuit) in Tolan v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 10:39 am by Jon Sands
  The district court disagreed, holding that ineffective assistance of state habeas counsel could never qualify as good cause to return to state court; it then dismissed the mixed § 2254 petition pursuant to Rose v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 1:27 pm by Ronald Mann
When Assistant to the Solicitor General Brian Fletcher appeared on behalf of the federal government, Justice Alito occupied much of his time expressing his concern about giving district courts too much leeway in cases of such financial importance. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:37 am by bryannewland
A panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision yesterday in Big Lagoon Rancheria v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 12:00 pm by Robert Chesney
If that question interests you, then you will want to keep a lookout for a landmark district court judgment expected in early 2014. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:49 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
She wondered why the State was the petitioner here when the district court expressly did not include the State in the denial for an injunction against the Vanderbilt casino (it was a motion by the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians instead), a point made by the National Congress of American Indians. [read post]