Search for: "Held v. Secretary of Health and Human Services" Results 181 - 200 of 438
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2019, 9:30 pm by Alana Bevan
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) over a new rule that seeks to strengthen health care providers’ ability to refuse to perform abortions or other procedures under federal conscience laws. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 7:00 am by Jonathan Shaub
The individual does not have the authority to waive that privilege, and agency regulations, called Touhy regulations after the Supreme Court case Touhy v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am by Stephanie Zable
And on March 6, Huawei and its U.S. subsidiary sued the U.S. government and the secretaries of labor, health and human services, education, agriculture, veterans affairs, and the interior, as well as the administrator of the General Services Administration. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Lev Sugarman
Speakers will include Secretary of the Army Mark Esper, Secretary of the Navy Richard Spencer, Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson and moderator Kathleen H. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Malaysia The Federal Court has held that a person who lodges a police report could be held accountable for defamation if he or she repeats the contents of the report to the public. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am by John Elwood
Three other new relists involve challenges to the Defense Department’s policy respecting transgender service members, under which those found to have gender dysphoria would generally be barred from military service: Trump v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm by Schachtman
The Court held that the plain language of Rule 702 does not memorialize Frye; rather the rule requires an epistemic warrant for the opinion testimony of expert witnesses. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) proposed a rule that would require drug manufacturers to disclose the list price of medications in television advertisements. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Chinmayi Sharma
Four years later, in November 2017, the case was finally heard by a chamber of the ECHR alongside two related cases that also brought allegations under Article 8: the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (2014) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (2015). [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 7:28 am by Robert Chesney
In general, there are three practices at issue: bulk interception of “external communications”; receipt of the fruits of U.S. collection efforts; and targeted requests for metadata held by communication service providers. a. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:55 am by MATHEW PURCHASE, MATRIX
Accordingly, in R (T) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police [2015] AC 49, the Supreme Court held that the extent of both regimes breached Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm by Edith Roberts
Department of Health and Human Services, in 2015, Kavanaugh would have held that the ACA complied with the clause of the Constitution that requires all bills for raising revenue to originate in the House of Repre [read post]