Search for: "IN RE RULES FOR THE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL ELECTIONS"
Results 181 - 200
of 664
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2021, 6:39 pm
Unlike liberal democratic states where official histories are embedded within the privatized factionalism of political and social movements whose representatives people our elective state institutions, and fuel the engines of academic and administrative apparatus for the management of correct thinking, Marxist Leninist states view the crafting of official history as both a necessity, and as an inherently public political project that is of the utmost importance for the chronicling of the… [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
Res. 965 for determining whether a public health emergency due to COVID-19 has begun and when it has ended. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:00 am
Judicial Appointments to Lower Courts One of Harper’s earliest reforms was to change the composition of the Judicial Advisory Committees (JACs) that select all federally appointed judges (section 96 and 101) apart from the Supreme Court of Canada. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:47 am
Jones is not up for re-election until 2020, but he represents a deep-red state. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 3:53 pm
But the judicialization of intelligence collection means that a lot of FISA “surveillance” orders look a lot like, well, bank subpoenas or telephone company billing record requests. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 7:47 pm
After much well curated public and private activity, the Open Ended Inter-Governmental Working Group on TNCs and Other Business Enterprises With Respect to Human Rights has released its Second Draft of a Legally Binding Instrument to Regulate, in International Human Rights Law, the Activities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 7:05 am
Wisconsin Right to Life Committee, 551 U.S. 449 (2007), the Wisconsin Right to Life Committee (a nonprofit corporation subject to the limitations of McCain-Feingold) ran ads encouraging viewers to contact Wisconsin's U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 11:22 pm
They're "dangerous. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 7:38 am
Too, we are not inclined to overstep our judicial role and attempt to re-draft Section 3.2 to remedy the constitutional infirmities we perceive. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
The obstruction charge does include a statement that the charged actions were “consistent with President Trump’s previous efforts to undermine United States Government investigations into foreign interference in United States elections. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 8:52 am
Last year, House Judiciary Committee Chair Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., Sen. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
Senate intelligence committee during its investigation into Russian election interference and of participating in a scheme to circumvent the ban on foreign donations to President Trump’s inaugural committee by lining up a straw purchaser to pay $50,000 for tickets to the inauguration. [read post]
The Implications of An ICJ Finding that Israel is Committing the Crime Against Humanity of Apartheid
20 Mar 2024, 5:55 am
These States might also consider re-establishing the U.N. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:22 pm
The ITC is a federal, quasi-judicial agency that regulates the importation of goods coming into the United States. [read post]
The Easiest Case for the Prosecution: Trump’s Aiding and Abetting Unlawful Occupation of the Capitol
21 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
Why else did he fail for hours to ask his supporters to desist, and why, even then, did he tell these criminals “we love you” and “you’re very special”? [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 10:15 pm
Can you think of any other context in which judges defer to the constitutional rulings of Congress? [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:40 pm
Should the forgiveness doctrine apply to an official who is re-elected? [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
Voters in New York City passed a revision that would allow for ranked-choice voting in elections. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Yet, Justice Thomas, writing for all the originalists, specifically rejected this mode of analysis universally accepted when the people ratified our Constitution.Why would our loudest originalist justice write an opinion so at odds with what everyone at the founding thought about judicial review? [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Scotland’s Court of Session has heard arguments in a judicial review of the Scottish government’s decision against investigating purported discrepancies in Trump’s financial reporting and two golf club purchases. [read post]
