Search for: "In re Adoption of Douglas"
Results 181 - 200
of 357
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
She informs us that Oklahoma has re-enacted at least part of the tort reform legislation (see here for our previous discussion), that the Oklahoma Supreme Court struck down on technical (single subject) grounds in Douglas v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
Res. 19, Tuesday, June 3, 2014, Washington, D.C. [read post]
30 May 2014, 7:49 am
Now that we’re firmly in the information age, it’s time for trade secrets to join their peers. [read post]
28 May 2014, 9:01 pm
That is precisely the principle Laycock advocated and the Court adopted. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
For the Symposium on Bruce Ackerman, We The People, Volume Three: The Civil Rights RevolutionThe Symposium raises two large themes, with many variations. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 1:23 pm
Millennials exist in world far worst than Douglas Coupland’s “low-pay, low-prestige, low-dignity, low-benefit” McJob, no for today’s youths there is the “no-pay, no-prestige, no-dignity, no-benefit” internship - where you have the right to work, but no right to pay. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 3:01 pm
http://t.co/VebzbIbbwl — Douglas Levene (@DouglasLevene) April 9, 2014 One of the companies cited, in Toronto, has two "concierges" instead of HR people. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 2:01 pm
http://t.co/VebzbIbbwl — Douglas Levene (@DouglasLevene) April 9, 2014 One of the companies cited, in Toronto, has two “concierges” instead of HR people. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
In 1998—not that long ago—Douglas McDonald and his coauthors identified two exceptional cases of performance-based compensation: the “Bureau of Prisons’ contract with Wackenhut for the operation of the Taft Correctional Institution in California,” which allowed for “an award-fee incentive worth up to 5 percent of paid invoices,” and a District of Columbia contract with CCA for the Correctional Treatment Facility, “which permit[ted] financial… [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:30 am
” It was mainly the Uniform Evidence Act with some re-organization and re-drafting. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 11:14 am
“Sovereignty,” he wrote in a magazine article (attacking Stephen Douglas for being soft on States Rights!) [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 10:45 am
Resignation of the inquiry committee of the CJC concerning Justice Lori DouglasThe Lori Douglas proceedings are not new, nor are extensive criticisms of their legitimacy and fairness. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
., Matter of Douglas, 26 I&N Dec. 197 (BIA 2013)(child citizenship rights); Matter of E-S-I-, 26 I&N Dec. 136 (BIA 2013)(rights of incompetent respondents); and Matter of Lee (E-2 spouse's statutory right of employment authorization without need to apply for a work permit). [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 5:38 am
., Matter of Douglas, 26 I&N Dec. 197 (BIA 2013)(child citizenship rights); Matter of E-S-I-, 26 I&N Dec. 136 (BIA 2013)(rights of incompetent respondents); and Matter of Lee (E-2 spouse’s statutory right of employment authorization without need to apply for a work permit). [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:07 am
FEC dissenters and Justices Stewart, Powell, and Douglas. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
” Douglas Laycock, Regulatory Exemptions of Religious Behavior and the Original Understanding of the Establishment Clause, 81 Notre Dame L. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
I will therefore allow Judge Judith Rogers’ masterful dissent (in which she was joined only by Judge Douglas Ginsburg) to speak for me. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 11:08 am
”); In re W.R. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Douglas 13-191Issue: Whether the Due Process Clause is violated by the Florida Supreme Court’s new rule of preclusion, which permits Engle v. [read post]
