Search for: "Keith A. Little v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 214
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
This is elaborated a little more in the abstract: Pix credit hereABSTRACT: When the leaders of the United States and of the Peoples Republic of China refer to human rights, they invoke entirely different conceptions. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
The most famous case on executive privilege is United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:27 am by Dave
The drafter has been a little coy about this balance, preferring to repeat the balance and observe: "The Secretary of State would encourage authorities to consider the scope to take advantage of this flexibility to meet local needs and local priorities" (para 4.26). [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:27 am by Dave
The drafter has been a little coy about this balance, preferring to repeat the balance and observe: "The Secretary of State would encourage authorities to consider the scope to take advantage of this flexibility to meet local needs and local priorities" (para 4.26). [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am by Frank Cranmer
She appealed, and in Higgs v Farmor’s School [2023] EAT 89 the Appeal Tribunal ruled in her favour, at least provisionally. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 8:30 am by Joy Waltemath
However, the EEOC Director of the Office of Field Programs purportedly stated that the purpose of the mass emails was to identify potential class members. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 2:11 pm by Adam Feldman
These data can be parsed somewhat differently when senators are separated by state. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 6:19 am by Ben
Deezer or Spotify:- all featured artists combined and listened to in a month share €0.46 euros- authors (SONGWRITERS)  €1.0 euro- the state/ taxation €2.0 euros (more than the authors/ performers’ share combined)- producers (labels) and streaming services combined received €6.54.With no record labels willing to provide a panellist, it was left to Alexander Ross (Partner, Wiggin LLP) and chair Keith Harris OB (a band manager and until… [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 8:17 am by Eric Halliday, Rachael Hanna
” In practice, the FBI operates under the distinction that international terrorism is any act of terror ordered by a foreign group or inspired by an ideology that originated overseas, while domestic terrorism is any act of terror inspired by political motivations rooted in the United States. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 11:01 pm by Mark Bennett
At Balkinization, guest blogger Sharon Dolovich explains why the Supreme Court’s Farmer v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:10 am by Schachtman
The trial court decided the challenge based upon the Downing case, which was the law in the Third Circuit, before the Supreme Court decided Daubert.[6] The Downing case allowed some opportunity for consideration of reliability and validity concerns; there is, however, disappointingly little discussion of any actual validity concerns in the courts’ opinions. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 1:36 am by INFORRM
There seems to be little chance of IPSO finding such a breach, following its rulings in Littler v Sunday Express, and Elton-Campbell v Daily Mail. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 9:53 am by William McGrath
These cases and other matters from the last month are discussed in greater detail after the jump.The SEC v. [read post]