Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 181 - 200
of 21,008
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2024, 1:30 pm
If you can prove, using the facts and the evidence of your case, that you were not engaged in an act under s. 107(1), or that the evidence cannot place you as the perpetrator of a false statement respecting firearms act, then you may be able to defend yourself by stating that you were factually innocent. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 10:36 am
Under this element, the plaintiff must be able to show that the defendant’s breach of duty caused the plaintiff’s injuries. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 7:31 am
But one thing you must know is that a defendant’s insurance company is working adversely to your interests. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 7:31 am
But one thing you must know is that a defendant’s insurance company is working adversely to your interests. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 7:31 am
But one thing you must know is that a defendant’s insurance company is working adversely to your interests. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:30 am
” If the supervisor follows through on that threat, then the employer is vicariously liable. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 3:13 am
If you can demonstrate that the defendant was negligent, you may be able to argue that the defendant had the last clear opportunity to avoid the backing accident and should be held financially liable. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:08 pm
If a defendant is found liable for violating the FCA, the United States may recover three times the amount of its losses plus applicable penalties. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
Ghio et al. eds., Edward Elgar 2023) The successor liability doctrine allows a court to hold a purchaser liable for the seller’s liabilities or tortious conduct. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 3:00 pm
’s acquisition Medivation, Inc. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:06 am
In addition, she alleges that the other defendant, Helwig, is vicariously liable and directly liable because they negligently hired, trained, and entrusted Black with the tractor trailer. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 7:11 am
To hold a docketing vendor liable for negligence, a patent firm may need to insist the vendor’s contract acknowledges the vendor’s work is intended to be relied upon by the firm’s clients. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 7:02 am
In finding liability on the Section 17 claim, the jury decided that Terraform acted recklessly and Do Kwon acted intentionally.The jury also found the defendants liable on the Section 10b-5 claim.Finally, the jury found control person liability for Do Kwon.This is case No. 1:23-cv-01346-JSR. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 6:51 am
Absent said language, the lawyer would be liable for any attorney negligence. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:52 am
In opposition to P AMs motion the defendants/third-party plaintiffs contend that plaintiff and PAM are agents of one another and thus PAM is vicariously liable for the plaintiffs alleged fraudulent conduct. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
The MPPAA was enacted to address the problem that occurred when an employer withdrew participation from a multiemployer pension plan; while the plan remained liable to provide pension benefits to employees, the withdrawn employer no longer contributes to the plan, and thus other participating employers were likely to exit to avoid having to pay for the unfunded benefits of the companies that exit the plan. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:43 am
Daileader had tried to argue, in reliance on traditional insurance contract interpretation canons, that if the policy provided covered any of the causes of action in the adversary proceeding, then the insurer was obligated to defend the entire action. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 6:27 am
S. (2005). [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:56 pm
Under Tennessee law, even if the officers, managers, or directors are not themselves defendants, if the complaint contains allegations that they were in collusion with, or controlled by, the named defendants, the complaint should survive a motion to dismiss. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For example, in asking whether harm was foreseeable, the tort law’s negligence standard essentially asks whether it would have made any sense for the defendant to act in a way that would have averted the harm. [read post]
