Search for: "Matter of Said v Said"
Results 181 - 200
of 30,695
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2007, 4:47 am
On these facts, though, it could be said, as a matter of law, that the bracket was open and obvious and not inherently dangerous. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 9:09 am
Brakke v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 6:34 am
Lord Justice ThorpeA summary of Sharbatly v Shagroon [2012] EWCA Civ 1507 (21 November 2012).Sometimes you wonder how it can be that certain apparently obvious matters can be argued all the way up to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
12 May 2013, 11:10 am
Said Ruth Bader Ginsburg, speaking yesterday at the University of Chicago law school, ostensibly about Roe v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:03 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 5:37 am
Nutter's IP Law Bulletin covers Southgate v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 9:38 pm
The District Court invalidated the '533 patent on a summary judgment motion as being directed to patent-ineligible subject matter. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 9:59 pm
The defendants filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, arguing that the case should be dismissed because the asserted claims are directed to non-statutory subject matter under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:55 am
The desk often sold products to large investment firms including Man Group Plc (EMG) and Tudor Investment Corp., people familiar with the matter said last month. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 5:20 pm
The Court of Appeal reversed the trial court's award and said "No. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:56 pm
”Director Iancu added, “I have long said that in order to ensure that the United States remains the global leader in the technologies of the future, our patent system must move beyond the recent years of confusion and unpredictability on subject matter eligibility. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 5:28 am
Harris v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 10:46 am
I wanted to comment at least briefly, or more accurately thematically, on the Third Circuit’s decision last week in Santomenno v. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 10:45 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Smith v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:00 am
Foundation failed to meet this burden, said the court, as it did not establish that it lacks the attributes of a public entity. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 10:35 am
“We are pleased with the judge’s decision as this is the victory for the public,” Vaccaro said in a press release. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 8:33 pm
No, said the Court of Appeal in Dockerill v Tullett [2012] EWCA Civ 184 (heard with the linked appeals of Macefield v Bakos and Tubridy v Sarwar). [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:10 am
I, L.P. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 1:10 pm
In Great Falls Clinic LLP v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 11:31 am
The court in Mendez v. [read post]
