Search for: "Mr. Humphrey"
Results 181 - 200
of 202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
After extensive investigation, in December 2019 the Honorable Mr. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:54 am
Smith is coy and does not say, but in presenting Mrs. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 4:36 pm
Here’s what I’ve been able to learn about Mr. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am
Humphrey 13-1345Issue: (1) Whether it is error for a federal appellate court to undertake the same analysis for penalty phase prejudice in capital cases arising from both weighing states, where juries impose death sentences only after determining that aggravating circumstances outweigh mitigating factors, and non-weighing states, where juries are instructed that they may return a sentence less than death for any reason or no reason at all, even after finding a statutory aggravator; and (2)… [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 1:00 am
Cases involving the removal of such items seldom come before the consistory courts, but in 2022 Humphreys Ch granted a faculty to authorize the exhumation of the remains of the Petitioner’s father and their re-interment after the removal of some jewellery. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:00 am
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during June 2023 (I) Ten consistory court judgments were circulated in June, and the seven featured in this first part of the round-up relate to: Reordering, extensions and other building works Exhumation The second part reviews the remaining three judgments on Church Treasures/Sale of Paintings/Loans/Memorials Churchyards and burials and also includes: CDM Decisions and Safeguarding; Reports from the Independent Reviewer; Privy Council Business;… [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 1:00 am
It was said that no mistake had been made when the late Mr Greaves was interred in consecrated ground in the graveyard. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am
On June 29, Chief Justice John Roberts relied heavily on something called “the Decision of 1789” to expand presidential removal powers. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 12:30 am
Humphreys Ch. noted that it is now over 30 years since the interment of the cremated remains, and this raises two issues, one of principle and one practical: why there was such a long delay before asking for exhumation and relocation; and whether if such relocation were attempted would there be anything remaining in the grave that would be recognisable as ashes. [8].On these practical considerations, she observed: “[12]. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
Humphrey, 14-8349, two relists after arrival of the record before it won its grant. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 11:09 am
Sadly, it seems Mr. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
How well do you know Watergate? [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
. * 1322: Humphrey de Bohun, 4th Earl of Hereford was fatally speared through the anus by a pikeman hiding under the bridge during the Battle of Boroughbridge. * 1327: Edward II of England, after being deposed and imprisoned by his Queen consort Isabella and her lover Roger Mortimer, was rumored to have been murdered by having a red-hot iron inserted into his anus. * 1410: Martin I of Aragon died from a lethal combination of indigestion and uncontrollable laughing. * 1478: George… [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
”“No, Mr. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 8:34 pm
Mr. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:01 pm
Mr. [read post]
