Search for: "OPINION OF THE JUSTICES TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES"
Results 181 - 200
of 3,677
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2020, 8:53 am
On June 9, the Pennsylvania Senate and House of Representatives adopted Concurrent Resolution 836. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 8:27 am
This week, the Miami Herald published the opinion piece written by Raoul Cantero, former Florida Supreme Court justice, and Mark R. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 8:34 am
The law does not demand good faith from a seller in “those vague commendations of his wares which manifestly are open to difference of opinion,” said Justice Holmes in Deming v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 11:59 am
Justice William Brennan “used most of the opinion that Fortas had prepared, but he revised the most important part, the First Amendment test,” and released the opinion as an unsigned, per curiam decision. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 7:15 am
The movie also effectively conveys the role of the Institute for Justice (IJ), the libertarian public interest law firm that represented the property owners on a pro bono basis, and took the case all the way up to the Connecticut Supreme Court and the federal Supreme Court. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:53 am
The House of Representatives authorized these investigations, it notes, and the House’s rules allow the committees to issue any subpoenas that they regard as necessary. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:45 am
Justice Kagan announced the opinion for the Court in Miller v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:45 am
Justice Kagan announced the opinion for the Court in Miller v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:45 am
Justice Kagan announced the opinion for the Court in Miller v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 8:22 pm
DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed here represent those of Al Saikali and not those of Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP or its clients. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 8:47 am
Engelmayer noted that it took a great deal of physical courage to work as a defense attorney representing black people in the south. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 7:48 am
Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago in the October argument session than to Merit Management Group, LP v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm
" Chief Justice Rehnquist appeared twice before House committees on similarly mundane matters. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 1:54 pm
After the reading of the Constitution in the House of Representatives and despite the provisions in the new House Rules regarding the citation of a Constitutional provision for every piece of legislation introduced in the House, it is not going to matter much in my opinion. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 6:29 am
This is not to say that Taney was "correct," but only that it is patently "incorrect" to say that his opinion, and the opinions of the concurring justices, were any more legally problematic (or more "political") than, say, John Marshall's opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:53 am
It is worth noting that the ICJ has never refused to answer a request for an advisory opinion. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 5:01 am
” In 1878, in Opinion of the Justices to the Senate and House of Representatives, the Massachusetts Supreme Court, addressing whether bills proposing the spending of money must originate in the House of Representatives, stated, “[W]e are of opinion that the exclusive constitutional privilege of the House of Representatives to originate money bills is limited to bills that transfer money or property from the… [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 8:01 am
Roberts wrote the unanimous opinion for the Court in that case. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 8:14 am
” “One good item and one bad item for your Friday” — “…the New Hampshire Bar Association has published a pretty good ethics opinion to provide guidance to lawyers that find themselves representing clients who end up seeking out crowdsourcing to help pay their legal fees in connection with matters. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:30 pm
House of Representatives. [read post]
