Search for: "Pearce v. Pearce" Results 181 - 200 of 217
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
On the same day, there were hearings in the cases of 2 Wakefield Limited v Persons Unknown, Clarke v Rose and Wolverhampton City Council v Kevin Poole. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
On Wednesday 17 July 2024, there was a hearing in the case of Jones Nickolds v Pearce. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 1:05 am by INFORRM
Doughty Street Chambers has a blog post analysing the judgement in Versi v Husain. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Focus Graphite Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:46 pm
The Court appears to endorse a standard enunciated in a recent Canadian Supreme Court case (CCH Canadian Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 4:37 pm by Steve Sady
” Similarly, although the Johnson court treated the right to an appeal as a procedural option, the Supreme Court has treated the right to appeal as protected: where the statute confers the right to appellate review, the defendant cannot be punished for exercise of that right (Pearce v. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
In Northern Ireland, a pipe bomb was left outside the home of photojournalist, Mark Pearce in Newry, Northern Ireland. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On the same day there was a pre-trial review in the case of Ur-Rahman v ARY Network Ltd, before Sir David Eady. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 2:37 pm by familoo
” In line with Leggatt J, I prefer to try to determine the truth by applying the dissenting speech of Lord Pearce in Onassis and Calogeropoulos v Vergottis [1968] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 403, HL: “’Credibility’ involves wider problems than mere ‘demeanour’ which is mostly concerned with whether the witness appears to be telling the truth as he now believes it to be. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, November 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 3:38 pm by NL
During the course of his submissions in the Court of Appeal Mr Pearce for the claimants observed that this may not be an “all or nothing” case. [read post]