Search for: "People v. Thomas (1970)"
Results 181 - 200
of 254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2010, 8:51 am
The 1970s debt crises woke politicians up. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
”Although a majority of the Court denied certiorari, Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch would have granted the petition for review. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
Led by changes in China that accelerated in the years after the late-1970s, China has abandoned the traditional notion of the state’s monopoly on productive property and the necessity of aggregating for the apparatus of the state all power to direct and manage productive assets and the people through which productivity is extracted.[19] Central planning has been abandoned in favor of centralized control of key sectors and central direction of the rest, with control… [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
Thomas Carper, now a U.S. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
It is widely accepted that, consistent with the Dormant Commerce Clause, a firm doing multistate business must bear the cost of discovering and complying with state laws—tort laws, tax laws, franchise laws, health laws, privacy laws, and much more—everywhere it does business.[21] People and firms operating in "real space" must take steps to learn and comply with state law in places they visit or do business, or must avoid visiting or doing business in those… [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
They are literally the only people whose opinions genuinely count in his version of the law. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
FDA Advances Program for Real-World Evidence February 27, 2023 | Blair Bean Robertson, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals FDA’s approach to evidence-based decision-making may not be addressed to the right people. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:15 pm
In this post, my colleage Robert Thomas and I explore those questions. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:26 pm
EPW Hearing State & Local Perspectives On Transportation Morrison Enterprises v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Justice Clarence Thomas concurred to write that he should have joined the Quill dissent in 1992. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Many of the citations deal with eminently practical matters, but the courts have also thought it beneficial to call upon the philosophers for a variety of more strictly “philosophic” notions, for example, Thomas Aquinas on the doctrine of free will, and Bertrand Russell on logical constructions. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 1:19 pm
Beale v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
"[17] [V.] [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
We’re talking about people with at least an eight digit net worth. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
New English Bible and Apocrypha (1970)7. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:02 am
Of particular interest to Episcopalians is the current case in Massachusetts of Gill v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:00 am
Circuit decided Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am
’” Section 9.61.260(1)(b) is unconstitutionally overbroad on its face, because it criminalizes much heated political and personal commentary of the sort that is routine when people discuss matters that outrage them. 1. [read post]
