Search for: "Powers v. Crawford" Results 181 - 200 of 285
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2011, 3:41 am by Mirriam Seddiq
  Speaking of dead and communication.In a decision that basically all but over-ruled their decision in Crawford v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am by Christa Culver
PennsylvaniaDocket: 09-1396Issue(s): Whether a child's statements in an interview with a child protection agency worker investigating suspicions of past abuse are “testimonial” evidence subject to the demands of the Confrontation Clause under Crawford v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 6:43 am by Jeralyn
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments today in Bullcoming v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:00 am by Michael McCann
"I knew they were scouting me," Crawford said. [read post]
25 Dec 2010, 1:38 pm by legalinformatics
Park of the University of California Hastings College of Law, and colleagues, have published Bayes Wars Redivivus — An Exchange, International Commentary on Evidence, v. 8, no. 1, article 1 (2010). [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
Cooper was ready with a precedent of his own, the Court’s 1982 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am by Roshonda Scipio
. : Bloomsbury Press, 2010.Civil RightsKF4155 .S77 2010Mendez v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 7:58 am by emagraken
Justice Crawford agreed and awarded the Plaintiff $40,000 in damages. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am by Anna Christensen
PennsylvaniaDocket: 09-1396Issue(s): Whether a child's statements in an interview with a child protection agency worker investigating suspicions of past abuse are “testimonial” evidence subject to the demands of the Confrontation Clause under Crawford v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 4:32 pm by Guglielmo Verdirame
‘Sovereignty shorn of the last vestige of power’ [Lighthouses in Crete and Samos (France v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:30 pm by Erin Miller
The third decision is Crawford v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:40 am by John Bursch
  In certain criminal and sentencing cases (Aprendi; Crawford), Justice Scalia has fashioned a majority with Justices Stevens and Souter. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 1:34 pm by MacIsaac
  While the British Columbia Rules, unlike those of certain other jurisdictions, do not expressly confer a power to exclude witnesses on the court, it appears that the court has an inherent power to make such an order: see Moore v. [read post]