Search for: "Scott v. May et al" Results 181 - 200 of 421
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2015, 12:00 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Reverdy Johnson represented the appellants (Waring et al.) in Waring v. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 11:17 am by Jordan Bublick
The United States District Court of the Northern District of Florida made a landmark decision in Brenner, et al. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Administrator
” These verbal fillers typically operate under the radar and may be missed or, more often, excised by the conscientious court reporter. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:27 pm
 In this post, I want to focus on this curious passage from the Harkin, et al., op-ed: None of us contemplated that the bill as enacted could be misconstrued to limit financial help only to people in states opting to directly run health insurance marketplaces. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
Thus, for instance, Cao, et al., Willingness to Shoot: Public Attitudes Toward Defensive Gun Use, 27 Am. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Bar La Folie), 2014 QCTDP 13Juridiction : Tribunal des droits de la personne (T.D.P.Q.), Montréal, 500-53-000347-110Décision de : Juge Scott Hughes, Me Claudine Ouellet et Me Luc Huppé, assesseursDate : 30 mai 2014 DROITS ET LIBERTÉS — droit à l’égalité — actes discriminatoires — fourniture de biens ou de services — homme de race noire — portier — refus de donner… [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 8:32 am by Eric Goldman
See Amicus Br. of Electronic Frontier Foundation, et al. 24 (observing that “Neustar IP Intelligence . . . provides on-demand geolocation services for $8 per 1,000 addresses); see also http://freegeoip.net (last visited May 22, 2014) (providing this service for free). [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 3:48 am
Explains Scott:The Long Arm of Canadian LawIn a ground-breaking decision (Equustek Solutions Inc. v Jack et al, 2014 BCSC 1063) the British Columbia Supreme Court has issued an interim injunction against a third party, Google, ordering it to stop indexing or referencing certain websites in its search results, not just in Canada but everywhere. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
If a compleat supremacy some where is not necessary in every Society, a controuling power at least is so, by which the general authority may be defended against encroachments of the subordinate authorities.Without a sweeping national veto, even in matters of seemingly local concern, states would be able to “oppress the weaker party within their respective jurisdictions,” he concluded.[7] The Constitution, too weak, had fallen short. [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:36 am
Katakis, et. al., Corrected Notice of Motion and Memorandum of Points and Authorities 2 (May 5, 2014). [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 6:38 am by admin
Giulini is represented by Scott Stone.The case is Azzopardi v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:27 am by Douglas Laycock
Professor Laycock also submitted an amicus brief on behalf of  Christian Legal Society, et al., in support of the non-Government parties. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
”48 Werden et al. argue that the entire range of criminal sanctions must be available for convicted antitrust offenders, from corporate and individual fines to individual imprisonment. [read post]