Search for: "State v. Dow"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,037
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm
The first was a straightforward Jameel v Dow Jones & Co. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
See Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm
Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 874 F.2d 307, 311-12 (5th Cir. 1989) (“Fortunately, we do not have to resolve any of the above questions [as to bias and confounding], since the studies presented to us incorporate the possibility of these factors by the use of a confidence interval. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:57 am
In State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:57 am
In State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:57 am
In State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am
”13 Mandatory Not Precatory The better reasoned cases decided under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, and state-court analogues, follow the Reference Manual in making clear that confounding factors must be carefully addressed and eliminated. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 8:10 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 10:29 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., U.S. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 6:50 am
Lee, General Counsel, Export-Import Bank of the United States Elizabeth R. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 9:43 am
Dow Chem. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 3:41 am
Billy Goat IP LLC v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:59 am
Merrill Dow Pharms., Inc. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:16 am
Appellee stated that he was in fear of physical harm. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:12 pm
The law permits a president to “deal with any unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States,” if he first declares a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act (NEA). [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
In Haas v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 9:06 am
In The Dow Chemical Company v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 7:24 am
” The Opinion cites the Supreme Court case Bates v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 3:18 pm
TDY Holdings v. [read post]
