Search for: "U.S. v. Proctor" Results 181 - 200 of 211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Another vacuous response to a methodological challenge under Rule 702 is to label the challenge as “going to the weight, not the admissibility” of the challenged expert witness’s testimony. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:51 am
Proctor & Gamble Distributing Co., 973 F.2d 911, 913-14 (Fed. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am by Eric Goldman
Incorrect guesses included Disney (2 teams), Proctor & Gamble, Nike and Kraft. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:03 am
It should be circumscribed by the limits established by U.S. case law on the duty of care, and as such, should be seen as a subcategory of the latter. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
”Those restrictions, the plaintiffs rightly contended, make it impossible for them to file any Eighth Amendment claim should serious problems occur during their executions.On October 19, the U.S. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
 Part III stresses that under current U.S. law directors should have a duty to hedge. [read post]