Search for: "United States v. Raines" Results 181 - 200 of 336
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2009, 11:53 am by Michael Thomas
It stated that the principle enunciated in Canadian Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 6:30 am
First a word about the plaintiff: Some Kat readers may recall that Pom Wonderful prevailed in a closely watched decision given by the United States Supreme Court on June 12, 2014, Pom Wonderful LLC v Coca Cola Company. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kevin
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco:  Michael M ____ v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 10:42 am by Mark Walsh
The chief justice (of the United States, that is), then announces that Justice Neil Gorsuch has the opinion of the court in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am by Richard Hunt
 The United States represents every citizen, so “everybody” is literally true. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Ohio attorney Kevin LaCroix of RT ProExec in his blog, The D & O Diary Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 6/2/14: Health & Food Regulations; Expected Electricity Carbon Rule; Waters of the United States; & Acid Rain Litigation – Washington, DC lawyer Lee Beck on his blog, the Federal Regulations Advisor New Technologies Once Again Blurring the Lines of Copyright Law – Arlington, VA attorney Frank Montero of Fletcher, Heald &… [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
There again, the peculiarly interesting state of trade mark law in the United Kingdom and, not far beyond it, in the territory of the European Economic Area, might be closer to the cause. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 3:36 pm by Stuart Kaplow
And while the right to water is today a momentous global problem, it is also a serious dilemma in the United States. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The teachers than sued, seeking to vacate the arbitration awards in which they were found guilty of misconduct, contending that the disciplinary proceedings commenced against them, and the discipline ultimately imposed them, a fine, violated their right to free speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:34 am
This issue was decided against the assessee by the Special bench of the Tribunal in Rain Commodities v. [read post]