Search for: "California Employment Law Letter"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 2,237
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
You be the judge: 6 - How to make your clients look bad in 3 easy steps. 7 - The Manpower Employment Blawg analyzes the recent "Business Ethics" episode of The Office for employment law issues. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
You be the judge: 6 - How to make your clients look bad in 3 easy steps. 7 - The Manpower Employment Blawg analyzes the recent "Business Ethics" episode of The Office for employment law issues. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 9:25 am
If registering online, letter should be sent separately to Yale CME address below. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 9:25 am
If registering online, letter should be sent separately to Yale CME address below. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:50 am
California law generally treats accrued vacation as deferred wages. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
Harper provides general tips for employee legal issues in her article, “Checklist to Help California Employers Comply with New Labor Laws,” available here. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 5:51 am
I hear about them in the letters that I read each night. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:25 pm
I hear about them in the letters that I read each night. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:52 pm
Greenbaum is even inaccurate in identification of ABA-approved schools in California. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
X, The Hague District Court, The Netherlands (EPLAW) Poland Polish court rules on trade mark use (Class 46) Polish case law on industrial designs (Polish IT & IP Law News) Switzerland Cheshire Cat: a geographic indication? [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 7:00 am
An issue is that she claims different addresses in the letters. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 1:12 pm
("The Myth of the Disappearing Business Bankruptcy," California Law Review, 93:745-95 (2005)). [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:58 am
A California court tried to introduce these federal employer defenses into California law recently in Harris v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 11:33 pm
Currently, this opinion has no law force yet, so employers should wait for the California courts’ rule on the change.This opinion letter has a great difference than that of before. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 4:13 pm
Employers Ins. of Wausau, 2008 N.Y. slip op. 10227 (N.Y. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 11:48 am
Several of the recommendations, he said, including the one suggesting pat-downs only by guards of the same gender as inmates, posed problems under employment laws and union contracts. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 4:27 am
The director of California's Department of Industrial Relations issued an opinion letter clarifying one of the provisions of California's baby WARN Act. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 7:38 am
Court Improperly Excluded Testimony of Human Resources Expert Regarding Industry Standards of Investigating Allegations of Discrimination and Sexual Harassment California law particularly permits human resource testimony about whether an employer follows or departs from its own policies and standard practice in the industry. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:25 pm
Law enforcement officials shared the grim repercussions of sexting with A.C. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 10:47 am
In the Opinion Letter, the DLSE opined that there is nothing in California law that would prevent an employer from implementing a policy that provides for hour-for-hour deductions from accrued vacation leave for partial-day absences taken by exempt employees. [read post]
