Search for: "People v. Gay" Results 2001 - 2020 of 2,212
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2010, 1:40 pm by Rick
  People hate to hear that they’ve missed the point. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm by John Floyd
McCoy because of his sexual preference and this endeared Whitaker to the evangelical Christians who revel in the anti-gay movement. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 7:29 pm
Kamins was the lead plaintiff in the case, Connection Distributing Co., et al. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 8:54 pm
By Mike Dorf And now . . . still more on CLS v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 5:59 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Increase of 6% over 2009.JibJab: Osgood dancing with Santa Claus. 2004: Bush v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 12:21 am
Kamins was the lead plaintiff in the case, Connection Distributing Co., et al. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 1:48 pm by Chris Williams
It is much more likely that the “real” anti-Christian violence the Faith Office chases down will consist of people being “too afraid” to say “Merry Christmas” instead of “Happy Holidays” or having to go through all of the trouble of getting to the Supreme Court before you can discriminate against gay people. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:33 am by Jorrit Rijpma
In its earlier case law (D and Sweden v Council) on same-sex partnerships, the CJEU already ruled that these could not be equated with marriage. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:59 am by Scott Bomboy
” Recent Historical Stories on Constitution Daily Looking back at a key Supreme Court decision about gay rights The real-life namesake of Martin Sheen’s ‘West Wing’ president Plessy’s place in the list of worst Supreme Court decisions Looking back at the Brown v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:20 am by meghna
The Delhi HC in its leading judgment of Naz Foundation v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Although many privacy laws enjoy popular support, some paternalistic privacy laws seek to shape people’s behavior against their will, Hill wrote. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 10:50 am by JB
The Constitution is silent on how to fulfil this duty, leaving the question to all three branches of government consistent with their institutional roles.An aside: In Luther v. [read post]