Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 178,360
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2024, 9:30 pm
” The alert says none of these suits appear to arise from any active director nomination process at the defendant companies, and the potential plaintiffs’ attorney fee seems to be what’s motivating their filing. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 6:09 pm
The Court dismissed plaintiff’s claims, finding that plaintiff failed to plausibly allege: (1) that any of her sensitive data was transmitted to third parties from defendant’s public facing website; or (2) that pixel tracking software was even used on the patient portal. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:41 pm
“If Plaintiff’s investigation of ‘X’ were to determine that neither ‘X’ nor the other gamers were real people, then that would be evidence that LAPD knew that the 911 call was a hoax and did not perform a diligent investigation before sending the full force of the LAPD to Plaintiff’s home,” Dermot Givens, Abdullah’s attorney, wrote in a declaration supporting the motion. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 2:34 pm
A strictly secular education does not substantially burden the Plaintiffs’ practice of religion....This case involves California’s laws and regulations for state funded public schools, not private schools. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 1:35 pm
Legal fees, court costs, and potential damages awarded to the plaintiff can add up quickly and strain the company’s finances. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 1:33 pm
Accordingly, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s order holding the plaintiff in civil contempt. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 10:29 am
If this blog post gives our readers a feeling of déjà vu, there’s a good reason—the latest developments in the lawsuit challenging the CFPB’s final credit card late fee rule (Rule) are a rerun of earlier developments in the case. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 6:57 am
The Court of Appeal of the State of California Second Appellate District found an arbitration agreement between the University of Southern California (USC) and its employee (plaintiff) to be unconscionable. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 6:51 am
Their report, issued Friday, includes recommendations and is intended to serve as a ‘practical resource.'” “Fox’s Tubi sues law firm over ‘manufactured’ mass arbitration claims” — “Fox Corp’s streaming TV subsidiary Tubi has sued a plaintiffs’ law firm for allegedly manufacturing tens of thousands of meritless discrimination claims against it in the hopes of coercing a settlement. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 6:41 am
The court weighs the first factor for the plaintiff: As for commerciality, it is undisputed that the Committee’s use was purely commercial—the meme solicited campaign donations with its call to “FUND OUR MEMES!!! [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Prepare for your TTAB trial with ease with this template pretrial disclosure document for plaintiffs (opposer/petitioner) in a TTAB proceeding. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
”Since there were “triable issues of fact,” as to whether the defendants had been “negligent in the maintenance of their gas system that serviced the subject premises and whether that negligence was a proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries,” and because they had not unequivocally established the use of “reasonable care in their handling and distribution of natural gas to the premises leading up to an explosion,” the AD2 affirmed… [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
The plaintiff commenced this action, alleging that the termination of her employment violated Labor Law § 201-d(2)(c), which bars an employer from discharging an employee because of the employee's legal recreational activities outside work hours. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
The court agreed with the Plaintiff’s argument that the Complaint sufficiently pled a negligence cause of action against the individual Defendants as possessors of the property where the Plaintiff was injured, although not necessarily as corporate officers or agents. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
The plaintiff commenced this action, alleging that the termination of her employment violated Labor Law § 201-d(2)(c), which bars an employer from discharging an employee because of the employee's legal recreational activities outside work hours. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 4:30 am
It’s not an exacting standard. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 4:05 am
Plaintiff United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) enthusiastically supported the law’s bipartisan passage. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 2:00 am
In deciding if a claim is moot a court must determine whether it can grant the plaintiff any effectual relief. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
It is based on the firm’s memorandum, “U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 7:24 pm
Plaintiffs appealed to the Ninth Circuit, but the trio of judges on Monday appeared inclined to side with the lower court’s ruling. [read post]
