Search for: "State v. Plant" Results 2001 - 2020 of 4,020
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Daniel Folsom
But in subsequent decisions, the Court embraced a more nuanced approach: First, in United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 6:00 pm by Kirk Jenkins
A month after the state’s visit to the plant, one of the plaintiffs was involved in a forklift collision. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:52 am by John Jascob
Supreme Court invoked the major questions doctrine to invalidate EPA regulations that regulated greenhouse gas emissions from power plants. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 1:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
It took nearly a half-hour for the authors of the majority and dissenting opinions to orally proclaim in the courtroom their differences, in the six-to-two ruling in Environmental Protection Agency v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 10:08 am
Ag Supply the Supreme Court upheld the validity of plant patents, basing its decision on the PTO's history of issuing patents on plants and Congress' failure to amend the Patent Act to prevent the practice. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 1:43 am
In particular the court of appeals, ruling on its construction of the applicable state law, ruled "aerial photography of plant construction is an improper means of obtaining another's trade secret. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 10:51 pm
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. (01/09/2007, non-precedential): appeal of dismissal of patent and copyright infringement suit for failure to state a claim, effect of failure to respond to motion to dismiss, discussion of patent relating to growing plants in a small area using cloth (U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:31 pm by WIMS
The real threat of continued contamination of our nation's food supply was only highlighted last week when Monsanto's unapproved GMO wheat was discovered in an Oregon farmer's field more than 10 years after it was legally planted in that state." [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Both federal and state environmental review were necessitated for the project, however the appellate court only reviewed the relevant state law issues. [read post]