Search for: "Wood v. Wood"
Results 2001 - 2020
of 4,108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2015, 9:18 am
In the case, Symonds v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 12:43 pm
In State v. [read post]
10 Apr 2025, 6:49 am
Here are the materials in Town of Southampton v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 3:13 am
In BPAI decision in Milan v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 4:12 am
Civil Service Commission’s jurisdictional reclassification of 29 titles to the noncompetitive class violated Article V, §6’s merit and fitness mandateMatter of Brynien v New York State Dept. of Civ. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:05 pm
Maybe a decade of serving with Judges Easterbrook and Wood would have had an impact on her. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 10:25 am
’” Sands, Taylor & Wood Co. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 11:01 pm
The Classic Antitrust Case of Toys “R” Us v. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 10:19 pm
Comments on social media--or even court filings, such as in Coronavirus Reporter v. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 10:25 am
Lacquers; powder lacquers; colors (paints); coatings; distempers; wood coatings (paints); primers. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 12:53 pm
Wood, Empire of Liberty (2009)C. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
To recap briefly, the applicant 'Environmental Manufacturing LLP' (already known as ‘EM’) back in 2006 applied for a figurative CTM representing the head of angry wolf, for goods in class 7, namely ‘machines for professional and industrial proceeding of woods and green waste; professional and industrial wood chippers and shredders’. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 7:53 am
ISK Biocides, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:18 am
This case first dates back to November 2013 when Gemma Group, an Italian company specializing in design, production and distribution of machines for processing aluminium, steel and wood, filed an application with the EUIPO to register this figurative sign:The application was for goods and services in Class 7 (Machines for processing of wood, Machines for processing aluminium, Machines for treatment of PVC) of the Nice Agreement. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 5:30 pm
The Windmill lawsuit is In re Wood Creek Capital M v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 8:57 am
Chief Judge Kaye, relying on the precedent established in Murphy v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 1:19 am
Diane Wood of CA7 (April 30, 2009) President Obama and the Future of the Supreme Court (December 4, 2008) [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:38 am
Noland v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:11 pm
Another writes about the famous case of Moore v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 9:02 am
Monco of Wood Phillips, Prof. [read post]
