Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S."
Results 2021 - 2040
of 6,067
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2017, 6:59 am
The plaintiffs allege that the defendants violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act; Sections 6(c)(3) and 9(a)(2) of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC Rule 180.2 (manipulation); and CEA Sections 6(c)(1) and 9(a)(2) (use of a manipulative or deceptive device). [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 1:10 am
The creation and distribution of the coursepacks at issue have shown a decrease in sales and licencing revenues for CCLA, especially after the issuing of the copyright guidelines. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:09 am
Thus, Ralph argues his eight-year sentence is beyond the seven-year maximum sentence for an unenhanced class C felony, and he requests remand for resentencing. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 6:58 pm
North Carolina State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:10 am
”The Trust Agreement defines them as “any instruments or agreements signed by the Owner Trustee on behalf of the Trust, including without limitation, the Indenture, the Loan Purchase Agreements, the Administration Agreement, the Deposit and Sale Agreement, the Deposit and Security Agreement, the Servicer Consent Letters, the Structuring Advisory Agreement, the Assignments of Servicing Agreements, the Back-up Agreement, the Custodial Agreements, the Notes, the Indemnification… [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 6:55 am
L. c. 94C, § 47 – the Massachusetts forfeiture statute. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 12:57 pm
Burkfirst highlighted the outcome of the case UsedSoft GmbH v Oracle International Corp. case, C-128/11, ECLI:EU:C:2012:407, which involved the resale of “used” licenses for the Oracle’s downloadable software in the market UsedSoft. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:49 am
Roche, 563 U.S. 776; 131 S. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 1:17 am
Having discussed the criminality of the sale of grey goods last year (more here), the decision of the Court of Appeal was appealed by the defendants, ultimately ending up on the desk of the Supreme Court, which handed down its judgment in early August.The case of R v M, C and T concerned three defendants (including one company), who were engaged in the importation of branded goods into the UK that were manufactured outside the EU. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 9:20 am
Hypersonic Technologies ‘Blatant Sales Pitch’ on LinkedIn Likely Violates Non-solicitation Clause–Mobile Mini v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
The precedent from Detroit’s bankruptcy demonstrates that economic development measures such as PPPs can be important factors when analyzing a plan of adjustment’s compliance with the applicable confirmation requirements. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 9:09 am
By John C. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:08 am
Rap IP diss songs: Tupac Shakur’s Hit ‘Em Up v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:43 am
No, b/c it’s competitive/cost-based market. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
, Haney v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 6:02 am
Luftglass, Warren S. de Wied, Robert C. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 10:39 am
Boggs v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 3:24 am
Therefore, there is no reason to strain the construction of s 92(1) to exclude the sale of grey market goods. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:00 am
See PSC at 4 (citing Gannon v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 1:00 am
R v M; R v C; R v T, heard 19 Jun 2017. [read post]
