Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 16,386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2018, 12:00 am
In Perez v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 12:53 am
The Secretary of State is further empowered to issue guidance on the contents of the same, see s.218A(7). [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 2:48 pm
That's the question the United States Supreme Court considered on Monday in the case of Rubin v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 2:16 pm
See Upsolve Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 1:26 pm
Though not incontrovertible, the 2003 United States Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 6:37 am
Conclusion As the circuit split underscores, there are strong arguments on both sides. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
Both place their faith in the state, and in the community, to be sure. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm
” Howell v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 2:30 pm
From People v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:30 am
” Strong words. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:54 am
The Supreme Court just granted cert in Holt v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:55 am
The dissent argued that the State of Texas has a strong interest in (and a regulatory scheme in place for) ensuring that Texas attorneys maintain a high level of quality and that federalism concerns suggest that many of these cases should be adjudged at the state court level. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 8:49 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 9:17 pm
[Perhaps the Court can consolidate the New York Case with Young v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 8:35 am
York v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 9:55 pm
Thus, the Senior Immigration Judges commented that his was a family unit, “indeed a strong family unit, which has been subjected to a number of stresses over the years and has withstood them”. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 2:58 am
Siemer v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 9:36 am
R (on the application of (1) Homesun Holdings (2) Solar Century Holdings (3) Friends of the Earth) v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change Admin. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 5:18 am
The 9th Circuit blog has an interesting post about a predictable "cop as expert" case (United States v. [read post]
