Search for: "Strong v. United States" Results 2021 - 2040 of 7,105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2024, 5:53 am by Andrew Weissmann
United States  suffers from shallow reasoning, lack of historical support, and distortion of legal precedent. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 9:48 am by John Floyd
United States, decided on January 25, 2015, is also “the law of the land. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
    Here is the heart of the per curiam opinion in White:In this sentencing appeal, after two members of the panel agreed to an opinion reversing the defendant's 14-year-upward adjustment based specifically on conduct for which the jury had acquitted the defendant, another panel of our court rendered an opinion in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 8:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  How could it be widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States? [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 5:28 am
Bank of America, the largest bank in the United States, has agreed to settle a Nationwide Class Action related to its overdraft and non-sufficient fund fee practices. [read post]
29 May 2008, 7:00 am
District Court for the Central District of California, as well as the United States Court of Appeals, both refused to dismiss the case. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
Morris case that is currently being considered, along with two similar cases, by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Section 3 says the following:No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution… [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:30 pm by Theodore Ruger
Last summer, the Supreme Court put its money where its mouth was in terms of federalism doctrine in its landmark decision about the Affordable Care Act (ACA), in NFIB v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Colorado, in which the justices held that a state cannot require a defendant whose conviction is invalidated to prove actual innocence before recovering fines and fees imposed as a consequence of the conviction, observing that with this decision, the “presumption of innocence, already strong in our criminal justice system, became a little stronger. [read post]