Search for: "Sullivan v. Sullivan*" Results 2041 - 2060 of 4,162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2011, 9:03 pm by Lawrence Solum
Sullivan was handed down in 1991, and the most recent case, Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:57 am by Dave
  In Oxford CC v Basey [2012] EWCA Civ 115, the question arose for the Court of Appeal in the context of the range of payments which are eligible for housing benefit. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:57 am by Dave
  In Oxford CC v Basey [2012] EWCA Civ 115, the question arose for the Court of Appeal in the context of the range of payments which are eligible for housing benefit. [read post]
11 May 2010, 7:30 pm by Anna Christensen
  The Atlantic’s Andrew Sullivan suggests that Kagan’s lack of a solid record reflects her strategy of “avoiding any tough or difficult political or moral positions, eschewing any rigorous intellectual debate in which she takes a clear stand one way or the other. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 4:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Corp., 262 AD2d 436, 436 [2d Dept 1999]; Polzer v TRW, Inc., 256 AD2d 248, 248 [1st Dept 1998]; Banque Nationale de Paris v 1567 Broadway Ownership Assocs., 214 AD2d 359, 360 [1st Dept 1995]; see also Sullivan v MERS, Inc., 139 AD3d 419, 420 [1st Dept 2016]; Burger v Singh, 28 AD3d 695, 697-698 [2d Dept 2006]), there is no basis for imposing such a duty on Grover & Fensterstock based on its acting as Live Well’s attorney… [read post]
12 May 2017, 5:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Applying the Pell Doctrine in a disciplinary actionSullivan v County of Rockland, 2017 NY Slip Op 03519, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentDisciplinary penalties imposed on public employees in New York State must meet the test set out in Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 1:00 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Second Circuit (Sullivan, Chin and Parker [dissenting in part] says: Our case law is clear: 'it is not the proper role of courts to encourage nullification.' United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:25 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals (Sullivan, Cabranes and Nathan) holds that plaintiff cannot show that the white officers had intentionally acted to prevent him from joining the task force and that plaintiff does not assert there was any racially-motivated stereotyping.The case is Hanks v. [read post]