Search for: "Doe I" Results 2081 - 2100 of 259,190
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
I've made this point before, but I think Barrett is alone on this point, and the rest of the Court is [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 4:55 am by Eric Segall
Although the decision was consistent with some prior precedents, the Court could have easily gone the other way because, as I've written many times, given the incoherence of standing doctrine, in any given case, "standing is what standing does. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 4:54 am by Peter J. Sluka
For example, mere retirement does not entitle the retiree to dissolution or a buyout (Lubov v Horing & Welikson, P.C., 72 AD3d 752 (2d Dept 2010) (mandatory redemption provision of BCL 1510 does not apply to terminated shareholder). [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 2:00 am by Patricia McKee
Article I of the Charter enforces specific legal implications for lawmakers, emphasizing the need to weigh environmental considerations when handling legislation. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 12:00 am
For many, probation is preferable to time spent behind bars, but that does not mean you can do whatever you want while on probation. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by Eric W. Orts
At this point, there is very little doubt about the underlying facts of former President Trump’s attempted autogolpe, although he deserves (another) fair trial as any criminal defendant does. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 9:26 am by rickgeorges
You can check out his website and see some of the beautiful work he does. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 7:00 am by Gene Takagi
”” NY Times “The Axis of Resistance does not have a unifying ideology, but it does have the shared goal of diminishing U.S. influence, especially in the Middle East and Eurasia, and rolling back liberal democracy. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
  For example, Cass Sunstein has written: [I]t seems clear that to have a claim on lawyers' attention, any serious theory of constitutional interpretation must be able to explain why Brown was right. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 5:49 am by Kevin LaCroix
The professional services exclusion is there to ensure that the D&O policy does not pick up coverage for claims that more properly should go under the Errors & Omissions (E&O) policy. [read post]