Search for: "State v. Gathers"
Results 2081 - 2100
of 5,102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2016, 3:44 pm
Justice Rothstein stated as follows in the CBC v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:29 am
In his opposition affidavit, David states that he has no recollection of receiving it, and Singer’s claim that the letter was mailed does not give rise to the presumption of receipt, as he does not present evidence of defendant firm’s office practices pertinent to mailing (see Lindsay v Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP, 129 AD3d 790, 793 [2d Dept 2015]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v Brophy, 19 AD3d 161, 162 [1 st Dept… [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:46 am
Advertising/E-Commerce * Ariix, LLC v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:12 am
Summary of Decision issued February 18, 2009Case Name: Sheaffer V. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 12:01 am
In 1832, in the decision Worcester v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 7:44 am
In State of U.P. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
The Smith holding has been under pressure—in a Court decision in June called Fulton v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 12:34 pm
The case is Midwest Inst of Health, PLLC v Governor of Michigan (In re Certified Questions from the United States Dist Court), _ Mich __, __ NW2d __ (Oct. 2, 2020). [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:53 am
In the recent case (Cliff v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 3:35 pm
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 8:12 am
FTC v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 12:33 pm
More on Atkins v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 12:44 pm
In September 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed that holding in Jones v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 8:40 am
A bill to codify abortion rights was defeated Wednesday in the United States Senate. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:24 am
As Wikipedia explains, hearsay isinformation gathered by one person from another person concerning some event, condition, or thing of which the first person had no direct experience. . . . [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 1:24 pm
READ PARTS I-V (pp. 101-138 in SSRN version).We have been unpacking what might at first appear to be a rather straightforward inquiry: "what is law?" [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 12:32 pm
Static Control Components, in which it will consider who has the right to bring a false advertising claim under the federal Lanham Act; and United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 12:55 pm
Halleck (Feb. 25): Whether the private operator of a public-access television channel is a “state actor” – that is, someone who is acting on behalf of the government — who can therefore be sued for violations of the First Amendment United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 3:52 pm
And so then I began to wonder why there couldn’t be routine recording of social work meetings and interviews of adults – not by parents but by the state? [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:07 am
United States, a divided Court ruled that in general, law enforcement officers must get a court-approved warrant before they may gather data from cellphone towers showing where an individual was using a phone. [read post]
