Search for: "State v. L. B. T."
Results 2081 - 2100
of 3,630
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2017, 2:33 pm
“Almost all scientists have stated (or have been tempted to state) something like ‘the mean of Group A was greater than that of Group B, but the difference was not statistically significant’. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
L. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 7:57 am
" United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 2:04 am
A7171A
Abbate (MS) -- Provides procedures for resolution of disputes between a public employer and Suffolk county probation officers No Same asBLURB : Civ Serv. res ds Sflk Cty pk polLast Act: 04/24/09 amend and recommit to governmental employees04/24/09 print number 7171aA7196A
Weisenberg -- Creates the mandatory ignition interlock program; repealer Same as S 27-B BLURB : V & T L. mand ignition interlock Last Act:… [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 11:19 am
Michel and John T. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 1:27 am
EMT crime Last Act: 01/20/09 referred to codesA2573
Pretlow (MS) -- Requires a police officer or a district attorney to apply for a court order to compel a chemical test to determine blood alcohol content in certain cases No Same asBLURB : V & T L. req ct ord fr cm tst Last Act: 01/20/09 referred to transportationLast Action Date: 01/21/09(Results Count = ) Bill No. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
(Added L.2005, c. 671, § 3, eff. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
” The case is Lore v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 4:08 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Romie L. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
" Cont'l Can Co. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
It's something that the California Supreme Court didn't allow in Merrill v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
Court: Alabama Supreme Court Docket: 1111554 Judge: Murdock The State Comptroller, Thomas L. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 3:46 am
Case Name: Roden v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 3:46 am
Case Name: Roden v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 6:03 pm
L. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:24 pm
§ 1052(b), has never been questioned. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 9:14 am
AT&T Corp., 550 U.S. 437 (2007). (4) Bilski v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm
However, the Court of Appeal decided that a) the matter was of wider public interest and b) given that the appellant’s current AST was shortly to end, there was a [surely slim] possibility that Enfield would find that the chain of causation hadn’t been broken and that the appellant and his wife remained intentionally homeless, as per their review decision under appeal. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
”[6] The court’s stated standard is much less interesting than its reasoning process, which goes 2020. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:43 am
” Another employee noted that “Google automatically assumes you mean [the F]lora[-B]ama [Lounge]. [read post]
