Search for: "United States v. Kennedy" Results 2081 - 2100 of 4,067
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2025, 5:46 am by Scott Bomboy
In a petition to the Supreme Court filed in Department of State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 6:35 am by MBettman
At issue in this case is whether the Supreme Court of Ohio should update and clarify its attorney fee jurisprudence by adopting the United States Supreme Court’s guidance in  Perdue v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:28 pm by David B. Rivkin and Lee A. Casey
  As Justice Kennedy explained in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
Rakove sets out to solve in Kennedy, Johnson, and the Nonaligned World is how to explain the remarkable transformation in the relationship between the United States and much of the postcolonial world over the course of the 1960s. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 2:56 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 5:06 am by David Markus
United States, raised the issue of whether the feds could charge a woman who poisoned her husband under the country's treaty power. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 8:24 am by Lissa Griffin
United States, in which the court upheld the application of issue preclusion to bar relitigation of mistried counts when a defendant was acquitted of some counts and the jury hung on others. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 8:20 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
United States (No. 10-3623), the circuits are also split. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 8:54 pm by Michael O'Hear
United States (No. 10-3623), the circuits are also split. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 1:48 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The outcome:Polar Electro Oy (“Polar”) appeals from the decision ofthe United States District Court for the District of Delawaregranting Suunto Oy’s (“Suunto”) motion to dismissfor lack of personal jurisdiction. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:32 am by Lyle Denniston
”  In making that plea, the government lawyers had relied upon a sweeping statement by the Court, in the 1936 decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:55 pm by Mark Walsh
There is no authority in the Constitution of the United States or in this Court’s precedents for the Judiciary to set aside Michigan laws that commit this policy determination to the voters. [read post]