Search for: "Doe v. Delaware" Results 2101 - 2120 of 3,878
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2013, 10:36 pm by Steve Baird
These are some of the findings and conclusions by the TTAB last week in the long-anticipated decision Sheetz of Delaware, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
Every fall, I take a step back and survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and D&O insurance. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 10:36 am by Ron Coleman
” The defendant, Yale Academy, with locations in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Delaware, can make no such exalted claims — at least not yet. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 3:57 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Joyce, 603 F.3d 1142, 1143 (9th Cir.2010) ("The fact that [successful ICARA petitioner's] lawyers provided their services pro bono does not make a fee award inappropriate."); see also Hamidas v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 7:03 am by Florian Mueller
It was just probabilistic.Apple's July 2011 assertion of the '129 patent against HTC in Delaware never came to judgment because the parties settled before anything significant happened in court.Other reexaminations and reexamination requests involving Apple patents-in-suitThese two patents are just the latest Apple patents to have given rise to reexamination requests:In late July 2013 the USPTO issued a final (but not really final) rejection of all claims of Apple's pinch-to-zoom API patent… [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 11:05 pm by Florian Mueller
The ITC ruling isn't binding on the Delaware court in any way, but it does have some persuasive power. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:20 am by Susan Brenner
Zachary, 2013 WL 3833058 (Superior Court of Delaware 2013). [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:21 pm by Sheppard Mullin
By Karin Johnson and Megan Grant* When the Supreme Court issued its opinion in U.S. v. [read post]