Search for: "HILL v. STATE"
Results 2101 - 2120
of 5,319
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
Hill, 147 N.E.2d 321, 325 (Ill. 1958) (“a vested right to punitive, exemplary, vindictive or aggravated damages arises only when such damages have been allowed by a judgment); Langford v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:11 am
Idaho State Bar ethical rules prohibit attorneys from advocating against their clients’ interests. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
(Jones v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 5:06 pm
The style of the case is "Yolanda Luna v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:22 am
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 10:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 10:35 am
Abbott Clover Valley Foundation v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 9:54 pm
Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 12:32 pm
NYU Langone Health Sys. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:35 pm
In 2000, in a case called Hill v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
The Plaintiff Is Injured Falling Down a Hill after Leaning on an Unsafe Fence Post The plaintiff in Wheeling Park Commission v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 8:17 am
(NYC Civil, Kings Co., decided 9/15/08); Lenox Hill Radiology, PC, a/a/o Busanet v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 1:49 am
Retirement Plan for General Employees v McGraw-Hill Cos., 120 AD3d 1052, 2014 NY Slip Op 06154 [1st Dept Sept. 11, 2014], in which the Appellate Division, First Department, reversed the trial court’s ruling dismissing a books-and-records proceeding brought against McGraw-Hill, and held that the petitioning pension fund’s stated purpose of the requested inspection, to investigate the board’s oversight of… [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 11:20 am
Hill, 199 N.J. 545, 974 A.2d 403 (2009). [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 4:50 am
To satisfy the pleading requirement for causation, it must be alleged that “but for” the attorney’s conduct, the client would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have sustained any ascertainable damages” (Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004]; Cosmetics Plus Group, Ltd. v Traub, 105 AD3d 134, 140 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
Hill’s Pet Nutrition; and Tas v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:52 am
Supreme Court properly dismissed plaintiff’s legal malpractice cause of action in the original complaint because he failed to allege that “but for” defendant’s negligent conduct, he would have prevailed in the underlying action (Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 272 [1st Dept 2004]; see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]). [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:09 am
’” And in State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:30 pm
Superior Court (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 1344, 1355-1356 [59 Cal.Rptr.3d 363], quoting the United States Supreme Court in Illinois v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 10:45 am
Hill NAACP v. [read post]
