Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 2101 - 2120
of 13,850
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2015, 10:42 am
In re Driven Innovations, Inc. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 7:02 am
[3] See, e.g., Energy Transp. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 3:51 am
Employees are notorious for multitasking when they’re forced to watch video training on company time. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 3:59 am
And, lastly, they’re easier for employers to administer. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 11:21 pm
When it’s 82/sunny outside and we’re headed toward a weekend, employees find it hard to work. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 3:59 am
And, lastly, they’re easier for employers to administer. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 3:51 am
Employees are notorious for multitasking when they’re forced to watch video training on company time. [read post]
5 May 2020, 12:59 pm
FOOTNOTES [1] See, e.g., Complaint at 3, ECF No. 1, 3M Co. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 5:45 am
" In re Apple Inc., Serial No. 86857587 (January 13, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Mark Lebow). [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 10:08 am
The tax bills do this to a degree, e.g., by allowing a lot of expensing (plus interest deductions to make some capital income affirmatively subsidized rather than exempt!) [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 5:33 am
In one such case, an absurd letter by Motorola Mobility to Microsoft entered the public record: Motorola wanted 2.25% per unit from Microsoft and explicitly stated that "the royalty is calculated based on the price of the end product (e.g., each Xbox 360 product, each PC/laptop, each smartphone, etc.) and not on component software (e.g., Xbox 360 system software, Windows 7 software, Windows Phone 7 software, etc.). [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 11:09 pm
In this post, we’re going to examine the power of Gen AI to help lawyers with extracting and analyzing legal documents. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 12:14 pm
Of course, the FCC can apply telecommunications carrier safeguards, e.g., Section 222 of the Communications Act, but only if it the Commission does not re-reclassify broadband as an information service. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 3:48 am
In re Appalachian Headwaters, Inc., Application Serial No. 90448759 (March 21, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
6 May 2018, 7:08 am
• There has been an increasing trend for the Beijing IP Court to overturn SIPO rulings (e.g., Patent re-Examination Board decisions affirming inventive step rejections). [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 4:32 am
" "While a shade name may also function as a trademark, see, e.g., In re Champion Int’l Corp., 183 USPQ 318, 320 (TTAB 1974), the record does not support such a finding here. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 10:00 pm
In re Pennington Seed, Inc., 466 F.3d 1053, 1057, 80 USPQ2d 1758, 1761 (Fed. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 10:15 am
See, e.g., Robin Bravender, Heritage Foundation’s record requests rattle feds, Greenwire, Oct. 2, 2024. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 12:14 pm
Of course, the FCC can apply telecommunications carrier safeguards, e.g., Section 222 of the Communications Act, but only if it the Commission does not re-reclassify broadband as an information service. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 7:00 am
Cir.2008); BMC Res., Inc. v. [read post]
