Search for: "People v J."
Results 2101 - 2120
of 7,242
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm
Yesterday, in Gundy v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 10:12 am
Six Justices joined Justice Brier's opinion today Rehaif v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 2:36 pm
Memphis Light, Gas and Water Division, June 14, 2019, McCalla, J.). [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 3:29 pm
The petitioner in Gamble v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 10:35 am
I told you he meant the people outside. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 5:43 am
Estienne & J. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm
On the same day Warby j heard applications in Advertising Standards Authority v Mitchell and in Stunt v Associated Newspapers and the case of Morgan v Times Newspapers was mentioned before Soole J. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:58 am
Frank, Robert J. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm
Warby J held that the only safe approach to take is to assume that the readership includes lay people with no special knowledge that would affect the way they read the words complained of. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 4:40 pm
Following the order, in 2012, Serafin became involved with Kolbe House, a care home for elderly Polish people, as a handyman. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm
However, because it disagreed with the Court of Appeal and instead endorsed Warby J’s approach, my view is that it is to be expected that it is the guidance given by Warby J which will prevail. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:30 am
PNP v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Notably, the petitioner did not testify that she had directed any of her aides to specifically supervise the student at the time of the incident.Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the determination of the Justice Center that the petitioner committed category three neglect (see Matter of Williams v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 151 AD3d at 1356-1357; see also Matter of Kelly v New York State Justice… [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm
On 7 June 2019 Warby J handed down judgment in the case of Spicer v Commissioner of Police [2019] EWHC 1439 (QB) (heard 5 June 2019). [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 5:01 am
That is the necessary implication of Rumsfeld v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 4:01 am
”[10] The issue of “healing” is effectively discarded in R. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
They have done so in Fort Bend County v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Pathologizing people’s justifiable anger at having no meaningful access to court is not useful. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:32 am
Neither right takes precedence over the other and resolution of the conflict requires an “intense focus on the facts” as per the decision in McKennitt v Ash. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:31 pm
Despite the controversy around these practices, it has never been discussed at the Supreme Court of Canada, until their recent decision in R. v. [read post]
