Search for: "TAYLOR v. TAYLOR"
Results 2121 - 2140
of 4,359
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2021, 12:39 am
Horror v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 12:01 am
Suspension without payElmore v Mills, App. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 3:36 am
Under certain circumstances, a municipality may modify or discontinue providing health insurance benefits to retireesMatter of Kapell v Incorporated Village of Greenport, 63 AD3d 940David E. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 3:30 am
Perhaps the leading case illustrating this principle is Taylor v Cass, 505 NYS2d 929. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 8:59 am
State, a tampering with physical evidence case out of Taylor County.Appellant's opening argument. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:39 am
When the Court first embraced the categoric approach in Taylor v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:09 am
State v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 6:31 am
People v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:31 am
Taylor, 2015-Ohio-3252 (10th Dist.) [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 11:07 am
NFP civil opinions today (2): Bart Taylor v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 6:40 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 8:40 am
The article discusses Carey v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 6:00 pm
Davis, 480 So.2d 625, 627 (Fla.1985); see also Webb, 899 So.2d at 346; Taylor Woodrow Homes Fla., Inc. v. 4/46-A Corp., 850 So.2d 536, 542 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Lopez-Infante v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
The union claimed that the School District had agreed to be bound by the "rule of one" under a contract negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 4:23 pm
Click here to find outLantana the movie hereLatest Australian jurisprudence on the same issue in Research Affiliates LLC v Commissioner of Patents [2014] FCAFC 150, noted on Patentology here. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
In Burnham and UFT, 28 PERB 4590, PERB ruled that the union's "duty of fair representation" runs only to employees; there is no such duty with respect to former unit members such as retirees [See, also, McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, 92 N.Y.2d 326; Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344].** Retirees are not employees for the purposes of collective bargaining for the purposes of Article 14 of the Civil Service Law [the Taylor Law] The decision is… [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 9:00 am
Cir. 1993) (quoting Sands,Taylor & Wood Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 4:00 am
In Hall v Environmental Conservation, 235 A.D.2d 757, the employer boycotted the disciplinary arbitration because it believed that Hall was not entitled to the disciplinary arbitration. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 7:28 am
Taylor. [read post]
