Search for: "People v David S." Results 2141 - 2160 of 5,858
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2013, 8:48 am by Donald Clarke
(Law on Legislation, Art. 8(v); that's one reason why re-education through labor, with its flimsy statutory basis, has been under attack.) [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 2:56 pm by Rebecca Jeschke
” This is an important ruling for the common-sense rights of all people. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:45 pm by David Oscar Markus
So many people are saying that Trump has no chance because it's in NY. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
”The Idaho Press Tribune recently ran a story on the federal judge who decided Reed v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 1:53 pm
Officer David Gibson sat on the passenger seat of the vehicle. [read post]
31 May 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Jeff Ifrah and David Yellen look at Murphy v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:30 am by INFORRM
In this regular feature we draw attention to the last week’s law and media news and next week’s upcoming events. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 7:41 am by Russell Beck
The following are some of the highlights: California:  Many people thought noncompetes were DOA with the California Supreme Court’s 2008 Edwards v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, David Rivkin and Lee Casey welcome “Justice Samuel Alito’s lone concurrence” in Gundy v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 8:33 am
Thanks for the heads up from @loveandgarbage (c/o Twitter) for the following news from David Osler, author of Dave's Part, who is facing libel action from Tower Hamlets Tory activist Johanna Kaschke, following a post on this blog in 2007. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 10:02 am by David Post
[The 1974 final, Holland v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 8:41 pm
This is the question that preoccupied Justice Kennedy in yesterday's oral argument in Jones v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:27 pm by Giles Peaker
” This broadly mirrored the case law, notably, R v Brent LBC, ex p. [read post]