Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 2141 - 2160 of 4,097
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2014, 11:06 am
 According to a California appeals court, it is. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:48 am by Neil Cahn
In its October 22, 2014 decision, the Appellate Division Second Department in Ebel v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 5:45 am
 391, 859 A.2d 364 (New Jersey Supreme Court 2004).State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 5:40 am by David DePaolo
Ohio's 2nd District Court of Appeal had found the accident to be compensable, relying on the dual-purpose doctrine in reaching that conclusion.The Ohio Supreme Court reversed the 2nd DCA, saying there was no causal relationship between the worker's job and the accident.Last year, the 5th District Court of Appeals ruled in Friebel v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 2:32 pm by admin
Toft, the Washington State Court of Appeals, Division I, held that the King County Superior Court erred in failing to consider whether or not a plaintiff is likely to prevail on his or her defamation claim before dismissing the suit under the Washington Anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) […]The post Washington Court of Appeals finds Trial Court erred in Slapping down Lawsuit under… [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Administrator
This dualist approach to international treaties is required by the logic of the Canadian constitutional structure with regards to both the division of powers and separation of powers. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 5:32 am by Brian Shiffrin
  The state appealed the denial of dismissal, prevailing in the Appellate Division – the intermediate appellate court in New York. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
 * A clear vision of genuine use: Specsavers v Asda (again) The Court of Appeal for England and Wales has just issued its decision in Specsavers v Asda, a very well-known saga the previous episodes of which have been severally covered by the IPKat [on initial skirmishes, here and here; on the High Court judgment of Mann J here; on the main decision and referral to Europe by the Court of Appeal here; on… [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 10:20 am
This is a decision from the General Court of the European Union (Ninth Chamber) last month which reflects the opinions long held by this Kat that (i) some appeals to the General Court are marked with a message in big red capitals that state "THIS APPEAL IS A COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME", in a magical letters that can be read by everyone except the appellant and that (ii) pretty well all appeals to the General Court in… [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 12:22 pm by Schachtman
He was an expert witness for plaintiff in an Oklahoma state court case, Helton v. [read post]