Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Scales" Results 2141 - 2160 of 2,797
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2012, 8:24 am by Andres
I’ve just finished reading the fascinating case of AMP v Persons Unknown [2011] EWHC 3454 (TCC) via the IP Osgoode blog. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
 Said Kitchin LJ: "I am satisfied that it is appropriate to make an order for an inquiry or account but that in the light of the scale of the infringements it is appropriate that the cases should be transferred to the [bargain-basement] Patents County Court. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 9:58 am by Sam Glover
Law firms don’t even rate a mention on the scale. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:06 pm by mstein03
In our next post, we review the momentous decision in Viacom v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:00 pm by JD Hull
Down-on-their-luck David & Son, with hungry counsel, v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:44 am
There are no people in front of the defendants' bus. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:30 am by Duets Guest Blogger
I used A,B,C,D,F, and no pluses/minuses because my undergrad alma mater used that scale. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 10:14 am
Under the "exceedingly high standard" previously set out in the case of Norandal U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
-China Renewable Energy Partnership” to “chart a pathway to wide-scale deployment of wind, solar, advanced bio-fuels, and a modern electric power grid in both countries and [to] cooperate in designing and implementing the policy and technical tools necessary to make that vision possible. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
-China Renewable Energy Partnership” to “chart a pathway to wide-scale deployment of wind, solar, advanced bio-fuels, and a modern electric power grid in both countries and [to] cooperate in designing and implementing the policy and technical tools necessary to make that vision possible. [read post]