Search for: "***u. S. v. Wells"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 4,285
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2015, 2:09 pm
Genentech, 2015 U. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
Johnnie Stuckey for Robert Holman v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 4:29 pm
In some cases, the patient may still be functioning well enough to make an enduring power of attorney, but in others it is too late: the patient has declined to the point where he or she does not have the capacity to make an enduring power of attorney. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 6:12 am
” In Rye v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
”Turning to DOE’s termination of Teacher’s employment, the Appellate Division, citing Brown v City of New York, 280 AD2d 368, observed that it is well established that a "probationary employee may be discharged for any or no reason at all in the absence of a showing that [the] dismissal was in bad faith, for a constitutionally impermissible purpose or in violation of law. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:52 am
” Hill v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 3:53 am
W.J., 27 Misc 3d 1222[A], 2010 NY Slip Op 50841[U], *2 [Crim Ct, NY County 2010] [“opposite” the address]; People v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:01 am
U of A Faculty of Law Blog 5. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:30 am
’s handgun ban would fail ‘[u]nder any of the standards of scrutiny.'” So the 2nd Circuit proceeded to Step 2 of Marzzarella: apply some form of heightened scrutiny. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 2:50 am
Palazzo, 20 Misc 3d 1107[A], 2008 NY Slip Op 51256[U] [Sup Ct, Bronx County 2008]; People v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Lamb v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm
And is incoherently applied in the U of Ala. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
” Earp v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:29 am
” Bailey v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:06 am
They made a U-turn and circled back to the park. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
U. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am
While Public Resources Code § 21061 – a general definitional statute not cited by OPR in support of its proposal – defines an EIR as “a detailed statement setting forth the matters specified in Sections 21100 and 21100.1[,]” this general reference is of unclear import and per CEQA’s own terms governs “[u]nless the context otherwise requires. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 2:16 am
It could very well be that a judge or jury at trial – when facts are determined – could find that the District Attorney’s Office failed to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
”[v] Justice Anthony M. [read post]
