Search for: "MATTER OF C A"
Results 2161 - 2180
of 36,759
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2011, 7:55 am
(C), the third-biggest U.S. bank, is shrinking a team of traders who deal in “hybrid” products as Chief Executive Officer Vikram Pandit cuts Wall Street jobs, two people familiar with the matter said. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 1:00 am
The appeal considered whether notice to an applicant of revocation of a sponsor’s licence in respect of his or her Tier 2 (General) Migrant application is required as a matter of procedural fairness. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 3:00 am
R (C) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 October 2015. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 8:02 am
Douglas McNabb and other members of the U.S. law firm practice and write and/or report extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, INTERPOL Red Notice Removal, International Extradition Defense, OFAC SDN Sanctions Removal, International Criminal Court Defense, and US Seizure of Non-Resident, Foreign-Owned Assets. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 3:11 am
Baron, MSPH, Senior Regulatory Consultant, B&C, has more than 20 years’ experience developing, implementing, and managing complex chemical regulatory compliance matters for some of the largest industrial and specialty chemical companies in the world. [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:23 pm
The outcomeUniloc 2017 LLC appeals from the Northern District ofCalifornia’s Rule 12(c) dismissal holding claim 6 of U.S. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined "Petitioner has not shown that [the Medical Board's] determination to deny her application for ADR benefits was arbitrary and capricious or made in violation of lawful procedure", citing Matter of Meyer v Board of Trustees of N.Y. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 4:55 pm
While the Trial Judge endeavored in his charge to limit the situation to the predicate class C felony of grand larceny by extortion, the situation was confusing. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined "Petitioner has not shown that [the Medical Board's] determination to deny her application for ADR benefits was arbitrary and capricious or made in violation of lawful procedure", citing Matter of Meyer v Board of Trustees of N.Y. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 10:35 pm
Even in other matters, where there is a special set-up or law, can that subject matter be referred to Arbitration? [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 6:21 pm
Following the UK IPO’s decision to refuse the applications, the matter was appealed to the High Court. [read post]
11 May 2022, 6:44 am
On 26 April 2022, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its long-awaited judgment in Poland v European Parliament and Council (C-401/19). [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 6:54 pm
Supreme Court, as anyone who has regularly viewed such post-argument segments on C-SPAN would already know well. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
My investigation of the shooting revealed the following: (a) the victim, Bobby Joe Sales, had committed no crime; (b) he was unarmed at the time of the shooting; (c) he was not threatening Connor in any way: and (d) he was shot in the back. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 9:30 pm
(c) The responsibility for omitting or redacting personal identifying information rests solely with the person filing the document. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
My investigation of the shooting revealed the following: (a) the victim, Bobby Joe Sales, had committed no crime; (b) he was unarmed at the time of the shooting; (c) he was not threatening Connor in any way: and (d) he was shot in the back. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
My investigation of the shooting revealed the following: (a) the victim, Bobby Joe Sales, had committed no crime; (b) he was unarmed at the time of the shooting; (c) he was not threatening Connor in any way: and (d) he was shot in the back. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
My investigation of the shooting revealed the following: (a) the victim, Bobby Joe Sales, had committed no crime; (b) he was unarmed at the time of the shooting; (c) he was not threatening Connor in any way: and (d) he was shot in the back. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 8:07 am
” “Examining a former client: A lawyer cannot use information from a former client to the disadvantage of the former client under Rule 1.9(c)(1). [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 4:52 pm
A Long Island Criminal Lawyer said this focus was made manifest by the Court of Appeals in Matter of Balcerak v County of Nassau, which concerned an injury to a Nassau County correction officer. [read post]
