Search for: "Steel v. State" Results 2161 - 2180 of 2,282
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
– Gene Johnson, The Seattle Times, January 26, 2010 Washington state will do more to prevent polluted stormwater from running off state highways into rivers, lakes and Puget Sound. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:48 am by Zack Bluestone
Harrington responded, “[I]t’s a very, very sophisticated program, and it’s something the ordinary person, such as a guard outside the cell with a steel door . . . may well not know anything about. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
– Michael Aubele, Valley News Dispatch, April 27, 2010 The federal Environmental Protection Agency and Allegheny County Health Department want a federal judge to sign off on an agreement with Allegheny Ludlum Corp. and Harsco Corp. intended to control slag dust at the Ludlum steel mill in Natrona. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm by VALL Blog Master
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 12:55 pm by Victoria Kwan
Without independence, there is no Brown v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:15 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
Steel’s defence basically relied on the unexpected economic downturn as justification for not honouring undertakings involving maintaining steady employment and continued steel production of two plants. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Implemented in 1991, Sweden’s carbon tax was one of the first in the world, second only to Finland’s carbon tax, which was implemented a year earlier. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 4:19 pm by Steven Boutwell
State agencies, including those in Arkansas, Colorado, Louisiana, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma and Texas, have all reported to the U.S. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am by Dan Carvajal
Ohio is one of only five states with a statewide gross receipts tax, but faced with declining corporate income tax revenues, other states are beginning to look to the Ohio CAT as a model. [read post]
16 May 2009, 7:33 am by Michael Payne
 Essentially, it prohibits, with certain exceptions, the use of stimulus funds for the construction, alteration, maintenance, or repair of a public building or work unless all of the iron, steel, and manufactured goods used in the project are produced in the United States. [read post]