Search for: "American Federation of Government Employees v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,860
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2013, 1:48 am
With the rapid changes in technology and a myriad of regulatory frameworks that may be applicable, employee handbooks may need to be updated much more frequently than ever – especially with respect to the rapidly evolving world of social media: Savvy employers, especially those with multi-state operations, know that employment actions are regulated at the federal, state and even local level. [read post]
9 May 2013, 1:48 am
With the rapid changes in technology and a myriad of regulatory frameworks that may be applicable, employee handbooks may need to be updated much more frequently than ever – especially with respect to the rapidly evolving world of social media: Savvy employers, especially those with multi-state operations, know that employment actions are regulated at the federal, state and even local level. [read post]
4 May 2024, 8:31 pm
Seilkop v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:43 am
Rather, United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 9:50 am
Answering a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the New York Court of Appeals in Makinen v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 11:27 am
Works of the United States government, including works prepared by its officers and employees, do not qualify for copyright protection. 17 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 6:33 am
American Needle v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 5:04 pm
Immigrant Legal Resource Center, et al., v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 6:53 am
See also Smelt v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:13 pm
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, in which the court ruled that government employees who are not represented by a union cannot be required to pay a fee to cover the union’s costs to negotiate a contract that applies to all employees; and Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 5:16 pm
Recognized in Who’s Who In American Professionals and both an American Bar Association (ABA) and a State Bar of Texas Fellow, Ms. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:59 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., et al., Supreme Court of the United States, 563 U. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
While many of these provisions are consistent with the laws of Bangladesh, several key provisions are drawn from either the law of the United States or norms included in a number of international treaties (only some of which have been ratified or incorporated into the laws of either the United and or Bangladesh). [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 6:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 10:00 pm
Chinese and American unions shake hands A form of solidarity between workers in China and the United States is beginning to take shape. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 2:30 pm
” Put another way, the FTCA allows plaintiffs to pursue state law tort claims against the United States government in federal court. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 1:14 pm
Instead, in 1998, the United States Supreme Court confirmed that the main federal anti-discrimination law (Title VII, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
Both the Civil Service Law and the Education Law, and rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to such laws, set out guidelines and procedures addressing the layoff of public employees of the State as an employer and political subdivisions of the State including school districts and BOCES. [read post]
