Search for: "Brooks v. The State of California" Results 201 - 220 of 390
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2014, 1:33 pm by Shelby Everest
 In denying the motion, the district court relied on its prior 2005 decision in Brooks Furniture Manufacturing v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 1:26 pm
 In denying the motion, the district court relied on its prior 2005 decision in Brooks Furniture Manufacturing v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:50 am by Amy Howe
In The Salt Lake Tribune, Brooke Adams previews next week’s oral argument in Paroline v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 6:00 am
 The AmeriKat celebrates Boxing Day theonly way she knows how - by notdelivering an opinion of the CFAC.Relying on the standard set by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Brooks Furniture Manufacturing v Dutailier, Inc (2005), the district court denied the motion stating that Sidense had not met its burden of establishing by "clear and convincing evidence" that Kilopass had brought/maintained the claim in subjective bad faith. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 7:47 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Relying on the standard set forth by a panel of this court in Brooks Furniture Manufacturing v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 6:33 am by Charles Sartain
Posted by Charles SartainIn an opinion with as many acronyms as the Dallas Cowboys have draft-pick detractors, a California federal court in Center For Biological Diversity v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am by INFORRM
There were a handful of resolved cases reported:  Full Fact v The Sun, Clause 1, 06/05/2013; Mr David Murray v Sutton Guardian, Clause 1, 03/05/2013; A woman v The Sun on Sunday, Clause 9, 03/05/2013; and Dr Carol Uren v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 03/05/2013. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Finally:  Mondaq has a very nice summary of the Fifth Circuit's recent opinion in Avalon Legal Information Svcs. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am by John Elwood
California "clearly establish[es]," for purposes of habeas corpus review of state-court judgments under 28 U.S.C. [read post]